Is it important to recognize LVH Pseudo-infarction patterns?

A middle-aged male called 911 for sudden severe chest pain.  The medics were very worried about acute MI and recorded a prehospital ECG.  It is unavailable, but looked like this:

As with many prehospital ECGs, the R-waves on top, & the S-waves on the bottom, are cut off.
There is ST elevation in V2-V4.
The medics were very worried about MI and asked to see me at the door to assess the ECG.
What do you think?

I looked at it and immediately said: "This is LVH. Not MI." And so we did not place the patient in the critical care area and did not activate the cath lab.

What did I see?  There is indeed ST elevation, but there is T-wave inversion also, and the TWI is in V4-V6.  You might think it is Wellens', but Wellens' is a syndrome, not an ECG finding.  It is a syndrome in which the pain has resolved (is gone).  This patient's pain was still present.

Furthermore, a true Wellens' ECG has T-wave inversion in V2-V4, not just V4-V6.  And it should not have high voltage.  While Wellens' requires R-wave preservation in the affected leads, high voltage should make you think of what I call Pseudo-Wellens pattern due to LVH.

Here is a true Wellens' case, showing evolution over time, in a patient whose pain had resolved:

A. First ED ECG: T-wave inversion in V2 only, Pattern A (terminal T-wave inversion)
B. At 2 hours, now V2-V4, Pattern A (terminal T-wave inversion)
C  At 9 hours, V2-V6, Pattern B (deep symmetric)

Note there are preserved R-waves
Note there is not excessive voltage

See this case:

Pseudo-Wellens' Syndrome due to Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH)

Case continued:

He was in severe pain and we were worried.  He had a history of hypertension.  We placed him in a room and recorded this ECG (this is actually the same one as above, but this time without cutting off the top and bottom.)

Classic LVH with ST-T abnormalities.  Although this may hide a subtle myocardial infarction, it is a typical ECG for a patient with severe concentric LVH.

We did a point of care cardiac ultrasound and it showed LVH.  We looked for, but did not see, a flap in the proximal aorta.  The root was 4.1 cm in diameter (slightly large).  We looked at the suprasternal notch but could not get a good view.  The abdominal aorta did not show a flap.

A troponin I returned elevated at 0.115 ng/mL.  So this is diagnostic of myocardial injury, and probably of MI, but not necessarily of ACS!  We have done many studies in our department of Type I and Type II MI (see references below) and most patients in our ED with elevated troponin either do not have MI (myocardial injury from etiologies other than ischemia) or have Type 2 MI (due to ischemia but not due to ACS).

A D dimer returned at 13,000 (very high!).  This is a good screening test for aortic dissection and normal for our assay is less than 230.

In spite of chronic renal insufficiency (Cr = 4 mg/dL), we sent him for an aortic CT:

Without all the images, it may be difficult to see, but this was an acute dissection from the aortic root all the way to the iliac arteries.

The patient went immediately to the operating room.

Here are two other very instructive cases:

Chest Pain, LVH with Incomplete LBBB, and ST Elevation

A Woman with 8 hours of Ongoing Crushing Chest Pain and T-wave Inversion

Learning Point

It is important to recognize Pseudo-infarction patterns not just because it prevents unnecessary cath lab activation, but because if you don't recognize it, you will have diagnostic momentum towards the wrong diagnosis (ACS) and away from the correct diagnosis (in this case, aortic dissection).

1.     Sandoval Y.  Smith SW.  Thordsen SE.  Bruen CA.  Carlson MD.  Dodd KW.  Driver BE.  Hu Y.  Jacoby K. Johnson BK.  Love SA.  Moore JC.  Sexter A.  Schulz K.  Scott NL.  Apple FS.  Clinical features, Management, and Outcomes of Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial injury: Impact on Incidence With Transitioning to a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I.  Annals of Internal Medicine.

2.     Sandoval Y.  Smith SW.  Schulz K.  Murakami MM.  Love SA.  Nicholson J.  Apple FS.  Diagnosis of Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction Using a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay with Gender-Specific 99th Percentiles Based on the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Classification System.  Clinical Chemistry 2015; 61(4):657-663.

3.     Sandoval Y.  Apple FS.  Smith SW.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.  Potential Hazards of Nomenclature Systems: User Discretion Advised.  International Journal of Cardiology 2015; 179:373-374.

4.     Sandoval Y.  Nelson SE.  Smith SW.  Schulz KM.  Murakami M.  Pearce LA.  Apple FS.  Cardiac Troponin Changes to Distinguish Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and 180-Day Mortality Risk.  Acute Cardiovascular Care 2014;3(4):317-325.

5.     Sandoval Y.  Smith SW.  Thordsen SE.  Apple FS.  Supply/Demand Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Should We Be Paying More Attention?  Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014; 63(20):2079-2087.