A 50 year old male presented to his physician's office with "heartburn". The physician recorded this ECG, interpreted it as normal, and sent the patient home on an antacid.
The patient went home and, in front of his wife, he collapsed. He underwent immediate CPR, was found to be in ventricular fibrillation, and was successfully resuscitated. I do not have the post-resuscitation ECG. He underwent coronary stenting (uncertain which artery). He underwent months of rehabilitation and was able to return to work part time.
Could this have been avoided?
1. A 50 year old with "heartburn" is a high risk complaint. There is no way to tell the difference between GI etiology of chest pain and MI. Therefore, even with a normal or non-diagnostic ECG, a 50 year old male patient should undergo serial ECGs and troponins and be admitted to a monitored bed until MI or ACS can be ruled out. This is obviously a very big topic in itself.
2. Did the ECG offer unseen hints? Yes
These findings mandate that the patient at least get serial ECGs.
If these remain unchanged, then serial troponins. An emergency cardiac ultrasound could be very useful. And if definitive signs of ischemia develop, the immediate antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and anti-ischemic therapy is indicated, including an immediate angiogram, if symptoms and ECG findings do not resolve.
Lesson:
1. Chest pain should never be assumed to be from a GI source, even if you think the ECG is normal.
2. Ischemia on the ECG can be very subtle and is easily missed. Accurate interpretation requires a lot of skill, practice, and experience. Appreciation of these subtle ECG findings could have helped to avoid a cardiac arrest and its resulting permanent disability
3. Down-up biphasic T-waves are usually reciprocal to up-down biphasic T-waves in the opposing lead and are almost always ischemic
4. T-wave size must be evaluated in the context of QRS size.
 |
| See explanation below. |
The patient went home and, in front of his wife, he collapsed. He underwent immediate CPR, was found to be in ventricular fibrillation, and was successfully resuscitated. I do not have the post-resuscitation ECG. He underwent coronary stenting (uncertain which artery). He underwent months of rehabilitation and was able to return to work part time.
Could this have been avoided?
1. A 50 year old with "heartburn" is a high risk complaint. There is no way to tell the difference between GI etiology of chest pain and MI. Therefore, even with a normal or non-diagnostic ECG, a 50 year old male patient should undergo serial ECGs and troponins and be admitted to a monitored bed until MI or ACS can be ruled out. This is obviously a very big topic in itself.
2. Did the ECG offer unseen hints? Yes
 | |
|
If these remain unchanged, then serial troponins. An emergency cardiac ultrasound could be very useful. And if definitive signs of ischemia develop, the immediate antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and anti-ischemic therapy is indicated, including an immediate angiogram, if symptoms and ECG findings do not resolve.
Lesson:
1. Chest pain should never be assumed to be from a GI source, even if you think the ECG is normal.
2. Ischemia on the ECG can be very subtle and is easily missed. Accurate interpretation requires a lot of skill, practice, and experience. Appreciation of these subtle ECG findings could have helped to avoid a cardiac arrest and its resulting permanent disability
3. Down-up biphasic T-waves are usually reciprocal to up-down biphasic T-waves in the opposing lead and are almost always ischemic
4. T-wave size must be evaluated in the context of QRS size.
Oertle, Paul
aVL does seem to have a hint of ST-elevation, but it's all so subtle. Good lesson!
ReplyDeleteLooks to me like there is ST elevation in V1-V3. Was that noticed by the practitioner and they didn't see the reciprocal changes, or is there no ST elevation (sometimes I think there is elevation but have been told by others that there wasn't)
ReplyDeleteThere is ST elevation in V2, but it does not appear to be pathologic ST elevation.
DeleteThis can even be missed by an expert cardiologist. But nice lesson though
DeleteAlthough its good to understand & detect subtleties,most physicians across the board are more than likely to miss such. The key element is appropriate risk stratification - good clinical history & gestalt especially in such atypical chest pain patients & going through the pathway which would buy you time in investigating & often keeping such patients in short stay units.
ReplyDeleteI partly agree, but in fact if you only admit and risk stratify patients with NonSTEMI, you will miss many occlusions. 30% of patients who are diagnosed with NonSTEMI have an occluded infarct-related artery at the time of angiography, which is usually more than 24 hours after presentation. These patients have higher mortality, worse EF, and higher biomarkers than NonSTEMI patients with an open artery. Patients with occluded arteries are far more likely to have ECG findings of ischemia, as this patient. We should learn to identify them so that we can get their arteries open. Or at least identify them so that we can do a randomized trial to see if early intervention improves outcomes in these patients.
Delete--Steve Smith
I think the biggest lesson is that we need to be appropriately conservative with chest pain and its equivalents in the middle-age to elderly patient population.
ReplyDeleteIt takes a TIMI score of 0 with stone-cold normal serial ECGs and biomarkers to get under a 1% miss rate for ACS. Anything other than that is in the low to high single digits for a miss rate, which makes patients like in this example slip through the cracks
I agree, but will repeat what I wrote above. You certainly don't want to miss MI and cardiac arrest, but, even if you admit and patient "rules in" for MI, you also don't want to miss a STEMI-equivalent:
DeleteIf, in fact you only admit and risk stratify patients with NonSTEMI, you will miss many occlusions. 30% of patients who are diagnosed with NonSTEMI have an occluded infarct-related artery at the time of angiography, which is usually more than 24 hours after presentation. These patients have higher mortality, worse EF, and higher biomarkers than NonSTEMI patients with an open artery. Patients with occluded arteries are far more likely to have ECG findings of ischemia, as this patient. We should learn to identify them so that we can get their arteries open. Or at least identify them so that we can do a randomized trial to see if early intervention improves outcomes in these patients.
Do the large T waves in V2-V3 qualify as hyperacute? If not, why not?
DeleteWithout a previous to compare to, one cannot say for sure. They do not look hyperacute to me: not tall or "fat" enough. If I apply my formula for differentiating the STE of normal variant from anterior STEMI, I get 20.5, which does not indicate LAD occlusion.
DeleteIf you go here, you will see many examples of hyperacute T-waves:
http://hqmeded-ecg.blogspot.com/search?q=hyperacute
Steve Smith
At this age with symptoms like his you should exclude myocardial infarction, I would have taken the cardiac enzymes (CKMB, troponin)
ReplyDeleteDarius,
DeleteYou are of course right. But the first troponin would be negative (in the era of troponin, CK-MB is superfluous). The ECG, on the other hand, is positive and if correctly, read would lead to immediate treatment, before cardiac arrest.
Interestingly, the patient's son's name is similar: Dario!
Steve Smith
Sir, though there is no STE in aVL but it seems ST segment is no more concave but is straight. Could it be beginning of STE in aVL?
ReplyDeleteIt could be. The most concerining findings are III and aVF. When you see these, you know something is going on in lead aVL, even if very hard to discern.
DeleteLead 3 and AVF does shoe an elevated T wave. V5 and V6 looks like something is going on, has a slow heart rate and looks like their is some blockage age.No matter if the patient was complaining of "heartburn", that should have been an alert to draw blood for Troponin level. Heartburn is a sign for a Heart Attack.
ReplyDelete