tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post7270848994472443156..comments2024-03-28T14:02:08.119-05:00Comments on Dr. Smith's ECG Blog: Full Text of Left Bundle Branch Block Article Now Free OnlineUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-9721796063612909462013-03-03T07:00:35.108-06:002013-03-03T07:00:35.108-06:00of course. that's why it is published in Anna...of course. that's why it is published in Annals.Steve Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08027289511840815536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-78990925871253788742013-03-02T22:23:09.182-06:002013-03-02T22:23:09.182-06:00Has this been peer reviewed yetHas this been peer reviewed yetarcher831https://www.blogger.com/profile/09387398686686632762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-7434086408722203062012-11-29T16:45:45.156-06:002012-11-29T16:45:45.156-06:00No, that is not the error.
As for de Winter's...No, that is not the error.<br /><br />As for de Winter's waves: yes, they happen with LAD occlusion and are definitely STEMI-equivalents<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Steve SmithSteve Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08027289511840815536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-61700018114388022032012-11-28T14:16:05.368-06:002012-11-28T14:16:05.368-06:00Interesting article, dr Smith!
I'm not sure w...Interesting article, dr Smith! <br />I'm not sure what the inconsequential error is.. Could it be that you called the measured proportion "ST/S ratio" although you actually measured the ST/R ratio in the leads were the QRS-complexes were positive? <br />One question.. Isn't de Winter T-waves considered to be a STEMI equivalent?P Hammarlundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12795866723817205360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-30478012373539351742012-11-27T06:31:23.281-06:002012-11-27T06:31:23.281-06:00I had not noticed that one!I had not noticed that one!Steve Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08027289511840815536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-80751196207836578722012-11-26T16:21:17.248-06:002012-11-26T16:21:17.248-06:00All I noted was that Fig3a calculated the ST/S rat...All I noted was that Fig3a calculated the ST/S ratio to be "2/23=0.087", which should be 2/-23=-0.087 if the S-wave depth measurements are to be kept consistent. Fig3b uses the consistent S-wave depth notation (i.e. negative millimeters).Christopherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11415988855392944633noreply@blogger.com