tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post5440437755618074534..comments2024-03-28T14:02:08.119-05:00Comments on Dr. Smith's ECG Blog: Why do we liberally record ECGs? And what do you think the angiogram showed?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-49646937047005487992021-08-12T22:25:07.480-05:002021-08-12T22:25:07.480-05:00love this post. i guessed RCA, incorrectly.love this post. i guessed RCA, incorrectly.tfierohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15955268501222734373noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-18949625029017234902021-08-10T12:59:37.135-05:002021-08-10T12:59:37.135-05:00great explanation
great explanation<br />Graydocerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18001264547915951825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-549949223388475481.post-90468324730131093562021-08-10T10:41:04.955-05:002021-08-10T10:41:04.955-05:00Great case Steve.. when I first looked at the ECG ...Great case Steve.. when I first looked at the ECG I saw Infero-Posterior OMI. Was this a Dominant Left-Circumflex Occlusion? Even retrospectively I just really don't see much STE in aVR. I see STE in II, III, aVF, worrisome ST-Takeoff, and relatively large T waves. Furthermore I think there is more STD in V4 than V5. Lead placement could easily account for lack of STD in V2, and for the less than classic (for Posterior MI) depression vector in the precordial leads. Overall I see a very subtle Infero-Posterior OMI and not "Aslanger's Pattern". Interested as always to hear your thoughts on my take. Thanks for sharing the case!@EM_RESUShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07335337127966226168noreply@blogger.com