A middle-aged male presented with acute onset of typical ischemic type chest pain.
Here is his initial ECG:
What do you see? |
He had a previous ECG from 10 years prior:
So we know he has LAD disease and previous MI.
The acute ECG (first one at top) clearly shows the previous MI (Q-waves). The T-waves are upright. Is this pseudonormalization? No. Over weeks to months and certainly years, inverted T-waves of MI normalize as part of the natural history of the ECG in MI (Although, in LV aneurysm, they often remain with shallow invertion). So before this acute event the T-waves were likely upright.
But these previous T-waves were not upright and hyperacute, as they are here in the top ECG: the T-waves in that first ECG are suspiciously large, and there is some hint of reciprocal ST depression in inferior leads. These findings need aggressive investigation with frequent serial ECGs or immediate echocardiography. They could represent LAD occlusion.
But these previous T-waves were not upright and hyperacute, as they are here in the top ECG: the T-waves in that first ECG are suspiciously large, and there is some hint of reciprocal ST depression in inferior leads. These findings need aggressive investigation with frequent serial ECGs or immediate echocardiography. They could represent LAD occlusion.
The pain continued and another ECG was recorded 1 hour later:
What is the diagnosis? |
These are now subtle de Winter's hyperacute T-waves; see the subtle ST depression in V3.
These were not seen or appreciated. The initial troponin returned at less than 0.04 ng/mL. The patient was admitted to the hospital without angiography in spite of continued chest pain.
A second troponin at 6 hours returned at 0.7 ng/mL (elevated). He was diagnosed with NonSTEMI. The pain continued.
A third ECG was recorded at 7 hours:
Now the T-waves are less acute, but there are deepening Q-waves and loss of R-wave height |
The troponin I was 16 ng/mL at hour 13.
Here is the 13 hour ECG:
T-waves are smaller yet, especially in V4 |
He went for cath and it showed 100% ostial LAD occlusion. There was no mention of collateral circulation.
Echo: Anterior wall motion abnormality with EF of 35-40%, although it is unknown what the EF was before this event. There was no myocardial wall thinning to suggest that this WMA was due to old MI, though the previous ECG is fairly conclusive about that.
Here is a post cath ECG at 26 hours:
Diagnosis: LAD occlusion in the context of previous MI, and manifesting subtle de Winter's T-waves.
Here are some more examples of the wide variety of de Winter's T-waves from LAD occlusion:
Possibly u could clarify this?
ReplyDelete' But they were not upright and hyperacute, as they are here: the T-waves in that first ECG are suspiciously large, and there is some hint of reciprocal ST depression in inferior leads '
Which 'they' you are referring to?
I have clarified it: But these previous T-waves were not upright and hyperacute, as they are here in the top ECG: the T-waves in that first ECG are suspiciously large, and there is some hint of reciprocal ST depression in inferior leads. These findings need aggressive investigation with frequent serial ECGs or immediate echocardiography. They could represent LAD occlusion.
DeleteThanks, now i understand it
DeleteComparing to the previous ECG, possibly there is NTTV1?
http://academiclifeinem.com/tall-t-wave-lead-v1/
Look at the comment I published on that post!! There is no good evidence to support this NTTV1. It is very insensitive and nonspecific.
DeleteIt could be more interesting if you write a little more about the patient's history, risk factors and pretest probability, to apreciate the context better . thanks for share your knowledge.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, in this case I have no more history. However, in a middle aged male with typical pain, you already have a solid pretest probability and everything regarding the need for immediate cath lab activation then depends on the ECG.
DeleteIn your experience is it common for DeWinter T waves to be mistaken for hyperkalemic changes?
ReplyDeleteNot often. There is one case on this post in which it happened: http://hqmeded-ecg.blogspot.com/2009/02/hyperacute-t-waves.html
DeleteMore often, hyperkalemia has right precordial ST elevation (not depression) as in these cases:
http://hqmeded-ecg.blogspot.com/2013/06/hyperkalemia-and-st-segment-elevation.html
Dr. Smith,
ReplyDeleteTo make a diagnosis of de Winter t waves, does the upsloping ST depressions have to be static or can they eventually develop into STE.
I noticed at his 13hr Ecg there appears to be STE most notably in v3 and v4.
I ask because I had a similar case that met the criteria for de Winter T waves on admission and serial ecgs but at about 2 hrs after first Ecg he then developed STE in v4-v5, so it left me wondering was it really de Winter T waves or just a STEMI ecg in evolution.
Thank you.
It is not known for certain, but I would not be surprised if most or all of de Winter's T-waves, if monitored for hours, eventually develop ST elevation. But perhaps not. you would have to wait and keep recording in order to find out and that would not be advisable!
DeleteSteve Smith