Friday, January 20, 2012

Subtle Anterior Transient Injury Pattern, Not Appreciated, LAD occlusion spontaneously reperfused

This 41 yo male was cleaning using a chemical and experienced sudden substernal chest burning radiating to both arms with SOB, relieved by sublingual NTG.  He called 911 immediately.  Here is the prehospital ECG at 1143:

There are precordial hyperacute T-waves.  The QTc is only 392, but there is very poor R-wave progression and the ST elevation, though less than 1 mm at the J-point, is 3 mm at 60 ms after the J-point, which indicates a steep ST segment.  The equation value (see side bar of blog, with excel spreadsheet) is 25.1.  A value greater than 23.4 indicates that this ST elevation is not a normal variant early repol, but anterior STEMI.  More importantly, there is ST depression in "inferior" leads and this is reciprocal to extremely subtle STE in aVL and a T-wave that is massive when compared to the QRS. (There is also some subtle STD in V5 and V6, which is another clue to STEMI).  The QRS is so small in aVL that the ST elevation can barely register.  The computer had nothing to offer.  The medics were worried.
Here is aVL blown up so you can see the relative size of the T-wave and QRS:
Tiny T-wave in aVL is giant when compared to the QRS. This is a hyperacute T-wave
On arrival, the pain was resolved and this ECG was recorded at 1201:

Notice the R-wave amplitude has recovered.  STE at the J-point is no different, but it is less at 60 ms after the J-point because the T-waves are not hyperacute any more.  The QTc is 401.  The T-waves are less hyperacute.  Equation value is now 22.5.  There remain some abnormalities in "inferior" leads.
So we have here a patient with a proximal LAD occlusion that has reperfused on its own (or due to NTG).

The findings of the first ECG, and their difference from the 2nd ECG, were not entirely appreciated, so the cath lab was not activated.

A while later, the first ECG was shown to me without any clinical data and, due to all the characteristics I have described, I was able immediately to say that it is an anterior STEMI.  Then, upon looking at the ED ECG, I immediately knew it was reperfused.  I knew there was a 90% unstable proximal stenosis with thrombus.

A reperfused anterior STEMI is a dangerous situation.  I once had a patient who reperfused the LAD, so I deactivated the cath lab, then he re-occluded and I re-activated the cath lab.  The delay caused his death. 

This could happen in this case, so it is imperative to at least treat aggressively with antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy.  The cath lab was in use, so this therapy was started, and cardiology was consulted.

Cardiology did an echocardiogram.  I was worried that they would find a normal echo.  This occlusion was so brief that the anterior wall, though it would have had a motion abnormality during occlusion, could completely and rapidly recover after reperfusion.  Thus, a normal echo would give a false sense of security: if normal, it would not rule out previous anterior injury pattern.  The ECG does not lie, and in the right hands is better than an echo.  This is an unequivocal ECG, especially with the serial findings.

Fortunately, the echo showed some subtle abnormality in the septum, but it was read by one of the world's experts in echocardiography and perhaps most would not have seen this abnormality and would have dismissed the ECG findings.  Then the patient might be admitted and re-occlude (and die?).

The first troponin was normal (so that is of no help).

The two of us talked and arranged for a cath.

Before his cath, this ECG was recorded at 1321:
There is further resolution of the findings and it is now normal.

Cath showed a 95% proximal LAD stenosis with thrombus.  A stent was placed.

Here is the ECG the next AM:

QTc is 378, there is no ST elevation whatsoever.  T-waves are much smaller than they were.  This probably represents the patient's baseline ECG, but we can't know for certain.

The peak troponin I was 0.9 ng/ml.  It is interesting that the ECG did not evolve any T-wave inversion, as might be commonly seen with Wellens' syndrome.  This goes to show that not all brief LAD occlusions result in Wellens' pattern of reperfusion T-waves.

This was called by the interventionalist and cardiologists a "Non STEMI."  Had the ECG findings not been seen in the ED, no one would ever have known that STEMI was missed.


  1. Very enlightening case sir. It goes to show that ACS is a dynamic event. We are reminded that the 12L is just a 10 second window of a dynamic event. Out of "free imagination", a lot could be seen in telemetry if there is a way to monitor representative leads of the anterior wall. I noticed that a telemetry system now can monitor 2 V leads aside from the regular limb leads. I do not know how cost effective could this be (anterior wall monitoring) if we run a cost-efficiency analysis vs. the usual care of such a case. It would be nice to know. We might even see that a NSTEMI is really an STEMI in real time monitoring.

  2. There are many studies on 12 lead or 3 lead monitoring. One in the ED by Fesmire showed impressive improvement in senstivity and specificity for STEMI:

    Fesmire FM. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31(1):3-11.

    STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring (SECG) is more sensitive and specific than the initial 12-lead ECG in the detection of injury and ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) during the initial ED evaluation of patients with chest pain. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in 1,000 patients with chest pain who were admitted to a university teaching hospital and who underwent continuous ST-segment monitoring with SECG during the initial ED evaluation. The initial ECG was obtained on presentation, and SECG readings were obtained at least every 20 minutes during the ED evaluation. Diagnostic abnormalities on the initial ECG were defined as injury or ischemia. Diagnostic changes on SECG were defined as evolving injury, evolving ischemia, new injury, or new ischemia. ACS was defined as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina. RESULTS: A diagnostic SECG was more sensitive than a diagnostic initial ECG for detection of AMI (68.1% versus 55.4%; P < .0001) and ACS (34.2% versus 27.5%; P < .0001). A diagnostic SECG was more specific than a diagnostic initial ECG for detection of ACS (99.4% versus 97.1%; P < .01). SECG detected injury in an additional 16.2% of AMI patients compared with the initial ECG (61.8% versus 45.6%; P < .0001; 95% confidence interval for difference of proportions, 10.9% to 21.4%). CONCLUSION: SECG during the initial ED evaluation is more sensitive and more specific than the initial ECG in the identification of ACS. Patients with a diagnostic SECG need intensive antiischemic therapy, evaluation for reperfusion therapy, and admission to an ICU.

  3. I'm one of the medics you noted as being "worried" about this patient's condition. Your post is the first feedback I've received on this guy's outcome.

    Yeah, we were worried. The patient was worried and his panicked wife called several times in the few minutes we were on scene.

    We had an obviously sick patient on our stretcher and didn't quite know why - other than the facts of his presentation and an abnormal ECG that we couldn't decipher.

    So we did what any experienced set of medics would have done.... We hustled him to Stabilization Room.

    All kidding aside; This patient did as well as he did only because of you, Dr Smith. Good work.

    This patient and his family will probably never know just how fortunate he was to have you stroll by his cubicle.

  4. Duke, thanks for the interesting info and feedback!

    Great work on your part. If he hadn't gone to the stab room, they probably would not have shown me the ECG.

    Steve Smith

  5. hi doctor.

    i can see in V4 an STD followed by a tall hyperacute-looking T wave wich is taking origine in the STD, is this a De winter's T wave indicating an abtuse phenomenon is going on in the LAD ?

    thank you very much

    Dr Bensekrane Lotfi Djilali.

    1. I don't see ST depression in V4, but I do see it in V5 and I would agree wiith your astute observation that this is a de Winter's T-wave.


      Steve Smith

  6. hi doctor

    i noticed STD in V5 immediately followed by a tall large T wave wich is originating directly from the depressed ST segment, is that a De Winter's sign ?

    thank you very much

    Dr Bensekrane Lotfi Djilali.


DEAR READER: I have loved receiving your comments, but I am no longer able to moderate them. Since the vast majority are SPAM, I need to moderate them all. Therefore, comments will rarely be published any more. So Sorry.

Recommended Resources