(#1)
She is admitted, her trop peaks at 0.23, her next day EKG done 8 hours later is shown below (#2) and shows some terminal T inversion in V3, consistent with the positive trop and suggesting tight LAD occlusion but open artery (T inversions are "reperfusion T waves; an inverted T wave is a sign of an open artery and an upright T wave is a sign of occlusion or re-occlusion). Echo the next day is normal. She is diagnosed with "demand ischemia" and discharged home.
(#2)
The patient returned with another episode of syncope 15 days later. She had no other symptom except weakness; none whatsoever. She had the following EKG at 0700:
(#3)
Here there is 4 mm of ST elevation that can only be due to myocardial ischemia. If there is any doubt, then the presence of new ST elevation and T inversion in I and aVL should erase that. If there is still any doubt, the loss of R-wave amplitude in V2 and V3 should erase that as well. The inversion of the T wave in aVL and V2 suggests an open artery. However, this is a very strange looking Wellens' T wave because of the marked ST elevation.
The treating physician contacted the cardiologist immediately, but the cardiologist was not convinced, mostly because of the minimal symptoms and partly because it is not the classic morphology of anterior STEMI due to persistently occluded LAD, which should have upright T waves.
So they recorded another EKG at 0720:
(#4)
Now the ST elevation is unmistakable, even with the persistently inverted T waves. But because the patient was asymptomatic, the cath lab was not yet activated. A bedside echo suggested anterior wall motion abnormality.
Another EKG was done at 0739:
(#5)
This shows even more ST elevation. The patient was still asymptomatic. An initial troponin returned at 12 ng/ml. The cath lab was activated. There was a ruptured plaque with thrombus in the LAD, with some flow still (accounting for the inverted T waves).
Fortunately, the physicians were attentive and kept ordering frequent serial EKGs.
Learning point: some EKGs represent STEMI no matter what the symptoms, until proven otherwise by angiography.
Had no one there ever heard of a silent ami ???
ReplyDeleteA senior paramedic / trainer tells a similar story about leaving pt's at home. He nearly left an older lady complaining of weakness, nothing else, at home. His gut feeling meant he transported her to hospital.
The emergency department staff put her around the corner in a non cardiac monitored bed, she was dead 20 minutes later.
Regards
Dave
I can't speak for what they were thinking!
DeleteDr. Smith just a doubt...
ReplyDeletewas it worth taking the risk?
when in serious doubt wasn't a angio justified?
also wanted to know how did the cardiologist justify the rise in the cardiac enzymes.
PS- Sir, i have learnt wellen's.:-P
Again, can't speak for what they were thinking.
DeleteAn interesting tidbit, when Hein Wellens speaks he never mentions his eponymous syndrome. But STEMI ECGs are some of his favourites. He loves to identify the culprit artery and the position of the thrombus in that artery. This ECG, for instance, by his rules would suggest a thrombus in the LAD distal to the first septal perforator but proximal to the first diagonal (ST vector is pointing toward aVL). Do you have any more information on the angiogram?
ReplyDeleteI don't, but I agree that it is almost certainly proximal to D1, as there is STE in aVL and reciprocal STD in inferior leads.
DeleteThanx Dr Smith for posting this type of intresting informative valuable posts.once again thanx and pl keep continue posting such type of strange ecg .Thank u vry mch
ReplyDelete