Thursday, July 25, 2024

Resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation. Should the cath lab be activated?

This patient was witnessed by bystanders to collapse.  They started CPR.  EMS arrived and found him in Ventricular Fibrillation (VF).  He was defibrillated into VT.  He then underwent dual sequential defibrillation into asystole.  After 1 mg of epinephrine they achieved ROSC.  Total prehospital meds were epinephrine 1 mg x 3, amiodarone 300 mg and 100 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate.

The patient was brought to the ED and had this ECG recorded:

What do you think?  And what do you want to do?






The ECG shows severe ischemia, possibly posterior OMI.   But cardiac arrest is a period of near zero flow in the coronary arteries and causes SEVERE ischemia.  It takes time for that ischemia to resolve.  After cardiac arrest, I ALWAYS wait 15 minutes after an ECG like this and record another.  The ST depression usually resolves, or is clearly resolving (getting much better).

Just as important is pretest probability: did the patient report chest pain prior to collapse?  Then assume there is ACS.  In this case, the patient was 30 years old and there was reportedly some drug paraphernalia in the area.  This may or may not be true, but it should give you pause.  On the other hand, cardiac arrest from opiates is respiratory arrest followed by cardiac arrest, and the rhythm is usually brady-asystole, not ventricular fibrillation.  VF should make you think of ischemia, cardiomyopathy (especially scar from old MI), or one many other cardiac but non-ischemic etiologies.

In this case, the cath lab was activated and the patient had a normal angiogram.


See these related cases:


Cardiac arrest #3: ST depression, Is it STEMI? or is he an ACCESS Trial Candidate?







===================================

MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (7/25/2024):

===================================
Clinical ECG interpretation is a 2-Step process.
  • For clarity in Figure-1 — I've reproduced today's ECG — obtained following successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Figure-1: The initial ECG in today's case.


   — The 2 Steps in ECG Interpretation —

STEP #1: Describe what you see ....
  • The rhythm in Figure-1 is rapid and supraventricular (the QRS is narrow in all leads). The rate is ~130/minute. Although not immediately apparent (because it is hard to distinguish the limits of a P wave in lead II) — the rhythm is Sinus Tachycardia, as other leads correspond to the timing of what seems to be an upright deflection that is subtly notching the end of the T wave in lead II (and which almost certainly represents the sinus P wave). Confirmation of sinus tachycardia should be easy to verify when the heart rate slows a little bit (as the patient's condition improves) — allowing clearer definition between the T and P waves.
  • Otherwise — there is early transition (predominant R wave already by lead V2) — and what appears to be generous voltage (that is probably not abnormal given the young adult age of today's patient).

  • The most remarkable finding is in Figure-1 — is the diffuse and marked ST depression (most prominent in the chest leads) — with ST elevation in lead aVR > V1.

================================= 


STEP #2: Clinically apply to the case at hand ....

  • The ECG "picture" that we see in Figure-1 of a supraventricular rhythm with diffuse ST depressionexcept for ST elevation in lead aVR (and to a lesser extent in lead V1) — defines the important clinical entity known as DSI (Diffuse Subendocardial Ischemia).

As we have often emphasized on Dr. Smith's ECG Blog (See My Comment in the March 1, 2023 post) — DSI does not indicate acute coronary occlusion! It also does not uniformly indicate severe coronary disease. Many patients with DSI do have severe coronary disease — but many do not. Therefore — recognition of DSI on ECG should prompt consideration of 2 Categories of diagnostic entities:
  • Severe Coronary Disease (due to LMain, proximal LAD, and/or severe 2- or 3-vessel disease) — which in the right clinical context may indicate ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome).

  • Subendocardial Ischemia from some other Cause (ie, sustained tachycardia — sinus or from some other arrhythmia; shock/profound hypotension; GI bleeding; anemia, etc.) — or, potentially as occurred in today's case — Cardiac arrest secondary to respiratory arrest from a non-cardiac cause.

In Summary: Today's case serves as a reminder of the 2-Step process in clinical ECG interpretation. Rather than slowing the interpretation down — ECG assessment is actually sped up.
  • Description of today's ECG findings (Sinus tachycardia with diffuse ST depression and ST elevation in aVR) — is diagnostic of DSI. 
  • As demonstrated by Dr. Smith in his above discussion — Application of the ECG findings in Figure-1 to today's clinical scenario (ie, marked sinus tachycardia in this younger adult with drug overdose and respiratory arrest) — provides an immediate and much more likely explanation for DSI than trying to postulate ACS.





Wednesday, July 24, 2024

ECG Podcasts on 12-Lead & Arrhythmias — Pearls, Pitfalls, OMI & AI and Lots More


=================================
=================================


=================================
My New ECG Podcasts (5/28/2024): 
  • These podcasts are part of the Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular CME Podcasts Series ("Making Waves") — hosted by Dr. Anthony Kashou. They are found on the Mayo Clinic Cardiovasciular CME site. 
  • You can adjust the speed of the recording (If the speed is "slow" for you — increasing to 1.25 speed should be optimal for you! ).
  • Note the Timed Contents that I detail below facilitate finding specific material.
=============================



ECG Podcast #1 — Common Errors in ECG Interpretation (And How to Easily Correct these Errors!) — published by Mayo Clinic CV Podcast Series on 12/19/2023 (30 minutes).
  • 0:00 — Intro by Dr. Anthony Kashou: Welcome to Mayo Clinic’s ECG Segment: “Making Waves” (Today's discussion — About today’s speaker = Ken Grauer, MD).
  • 2:00 — Dr. Grauer: “How did you get so skilled at ECGs?” 
  • 3:30 — Me introducing today’s topic ( = “Common Errors in ECG Interpretation”) — and why I chose this topic.
  • 4:35 — I’m sent a tracing. The 1st “Error” is either no History (or a History that does not tell me what I need to know).
  • 6:40 — The need for a relevant History (Clinical examples!).
=====================
KEY POINT: Be sure to list all antiarrhythmic drugs (Note rate-slowing meds — Herbal products! — and ask about beta-blocker eye drops! ).
=====================
  • 13:10 — Next Error = NOT forcing yourself to commit to a diagnosis!
  • 14:10 — Next category of Errors = The need for a Systematic Approach (This will not slow you down! Instead — it speeds you up, improves your accuracy and makes you sound smarter!).
  • 15:50 — My System for Rhythm Interpretation ( = First, look at the patient! — then, “Watch your Ps, Qs & 3Rs” ).
  • 18:15 — The error of premature closure (Thinking there are only 2 answers = “VT or SVT” — because you forget the 3rd Answer = a relative probability statement!).
  • 19:50 — Not appreciating statistical odds! (ie, What are the odds that a regular WCT without P waves will be VT?).
  • 22:25 — What if you have a regular SVT ( = narrow-complex tachycardiawithout obvious P waves? (The 4 common causes? — The most commonly overlooked cause?) 
25:10 —  My System for 12-Lead ECG Interpretation: (What are the 6 KEY parameters to look for?)
  • The 6 KEY Parameters I favor for my Systematic Approach ( = Rate - Rhythm - Intervals [PR-QRS-QTc] - Axis - Chamber Enlargement & QRST Changes).
  • Be sure to look at Intervals at an early point in the process!

  • 27:50 — SUMMARY by Dr. Anthony Kashou.  



= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
NOTE: For more on "My Take" regarding the ECG diagnosis of acute OMI — See my ECG Podcast #2 (LINK and detailed Contents below!) 
  • Please also Check Out my new ECG Videos #406407 and 408 on this topic (CLICK HERE)
  • For links to ECG cases of artifact and other "technical misadventures" — Please check out My Comment at the bottom of the page of the February 18, 2024 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog.
And regarding arrhythmias:
  • For more on the regular WCT — See My Comment in the May 5, 2020 post and in the April 15, 2020 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog. 
  • For more on the regular SVT — See My Comment in the October 25, 2022 post and in the March 6, 2020 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog
  • For more on recognizing AFlutter — See My Comment in the May 1, 2023 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =



ECG Podcast #2 — ECG Errors that Lead to Missing Acute Coronary Occlusion (Reviewing the concept of OMI — and why the "STEMI Paradigm" is outdated and misses too many acute coronary occlusions!) — published by Mayo Clinic CV Podcast Series on 1/16/2024 (33 minutes).
  • 0:00 — Intro by Dr. Anthony Kashou: Welcome to Mayo Clinic’s ECG Segment: “Making Waves” (Today's discussion — About today’s speaker = Ken Grauer, MD).
  • 2:25 — Dr. Grauer: The 1st Error: Too many clinicians in 2024 are still stuck in the outdated millimeter-based STEMI Paradigm”. (What do we really care about in the patient with new CP [Chest Pain]? ).
  • 6:15 — Error #2: Overuse of the term, “NSTEMI — which practically speaking is a useless term. Many (if not most) NSTEMIs are actually OMIs ( acute coronary Occlusion MIs).
  • 7:42 — Error #3: The ECG criteria for diagnosing an OMI?
  • 9:25 — Are there hyperacute T waves?
  • 11:37 — Can you find a prior tracing on the patient?
  • 12:20 — Look carefully at neighboring leads!
  • 13:10 — The “magical” mirror-image opposite relation! (Use of my Mirror Test to instantly identify posterior OMIs — and inferior OMIs by comparing leads III and aVL).
  • 15:35 — Why posterior leads are not needed!
  • 18:58 — Look for dynamic ST-T wave changes! (How often to repeat the ECG?)
  • 20:25 — The 1st high-sensitivity Troponin may be normal.
  • 21:00 — What to know about the prior tracing?
  • 21:50 — The Biggest Error —  is not correlating the History to each ECG that is done! (Because the provider does not appreciate the concept of spontaneous reperfusion!).
  • 29:00 — Today's Final Error — is not learning from our cases!

  • 31:28 — SUMMARY by Dr. Anthony Kashou.   


ECG Podcast #3 — Computerized ECG Interpretation and AI in 2024 (Is there any computerized ECG program that can reliably help clinicians to better interpret ECGs?) — published by Mayo Clinic CV Podcast Series on 3/19/2024 (28 minutes).
  • 0:00 — Intro by Dr. Anthony Kashou: Welcome to Mayo Clinic’s ECG Segment: “Making Waves” (Today's discussion — About today’s speaker = Ken Grauer, MD).
  • 2:00 — Dr. Kashou to Dr. Grauer: "In 2024 — Where do you see computerized ECG interpretations and AI?" 
==============================
Please NOTE: I divided my comments into 2 "Eras, regarding the use of computerized ECG interpretations: i) The initial Era (ie, from the mid-1980s until very recently); — andii) The new QOH (Queen OHearts) Era — in which the QOH application for assessment of acute OMI is so quickly becoming widely available! 

General Overview of this Podcast:
  • From 0:00-to-5:54 = Introductory material.
  • From 5:54-to-16:13 = Review of my experience with computerized ECG interpretation from the mid-1980s until very recently ( = the initial Era).
  • From 16:13-to-27:00 = How the new QOH application may dramatically improve rapid recognition of acute OMI(For listeners primarily interested in QOH — Feel free to jump to 16:13 in this 28 minute podcast).
  • From 27:00-to-END  SUMMARY by Dr. Anthony Kashou.
==============================

More Specific Breakdown of Contents:
  • 2:20 — My "Disclaimer": What follows today reflects my opinion, based on my experienceI have no financial interest in any commercial product related to my comments.
  • I begin by offering some Pros & Cons of AI in our Life "outside" of the ECG World ...
  • 5:54 — So how in 2024, do I think AI is impacting on ECG interpretation? How much "human oversight" is needed? 
  • 7:15 — A number of fundamental errors continue to be made! So — Where are we going with use of AI for ECG interpretations?
  • 8:00 — To answer, it's worth looking at where have we come from? I trace my experience with computerized ECG interpretation, which literally began decades ago, in the 1980s! During these decades (and up to the present) — there continues the tendency for too-many-clinicians to accept without question what the computer says. This needs to change.

  • 10:20 — How the computer can best assist clinicians with ECG interpretation? Realize that clinicians with different levels of experience and different training have different needs (ie, The needs of an experienced cardiologist or emergency physician are different than the needs of clinicians with far less training and experience in ECG interpretation).

  • 11:35 — My views on: Will the computer ever be able to interpret complex arrhythmias?

  • 12:15 — Regarding my experience from the 1980s until ~2010: How I went from hating computer interpretations to loving them (after I finally understood what the computer can and can not do).
  • 14:45 — Using my definition — Are YOU an “expert” ECG interpreter? The computer saves experts time. 
  • For non-experts" ( = 90-95% of clinicians, even though many such clinicians may still be very good interpreters) — the computer provides a 2nd opinion.
  • 16:13 — That was then ... What about now? (ie, What can AI offer us in 2024 as a way to improve our ECG interpretation?)

I emphasize these 4 concepts in these last 11 minutes (16:13-27:00)
  • — i) All ECG programs that I am aware of prior to development of QOH — are out-of-date, and of little-to-no use in emergency care! 
  • — ii) Computerized interpretations are not helpful for arrhythmia assessment (The simpler arrhythmias are obvious to capable clinicians — and the computer makes too many mistakes for complex tracings)
  • — iii) The new QOH application is already amazingly accurate in recognizing acute coronary Occlusion in cases when outdated STEMI criteria are not fulfilled (with rapid recognition of acute OMI that prompts early reperfusion saving valuable myocardium!). Future generations of QOH will continue to improve (See Dr. Stephen Smith's ECG Blog for numerous clinical cases illustrating features of this QOH application for OMI diagnosis); — and
  • — iv) Optimal clinical diagnosis of acute OMI at an early point in the process is best attained by the combination of a capable ECG interpreter who is open to receiving QOH input.

  • 27:00 — SUMMARY by Dr. Anthony Kashou. 



ECG Podcast #4 — All About Comparison ECGs for 12-Leads and Arrhythmias (Comparing ECGs seems so "easy" to do — but so often is not done correctly!) — published by Mayo Clinic CV Podcast Series on 5/21/2024 (35 minutes).
  • 0:00 — Intro by Dr. Anthony Kashou: Welcome to Mayo Clinic’s ECG Segment: “Making Waves” (Today's discussion — About today’s speaker = Ken Grauer, MD).
  • 1:50 — Dr. Kashou to Dr. Grauer: “What can we learn from ECG comparisons?” — and — “How best to compare tracings in time-efficient fashion?” 
  • 2:15 — ME introducing today’s topic — and WHY I chose to speak about this often-neglected but important clinical issue.
==============================
Please NOTE: My comments are divided into 2 "parts" regarding the use of comparison tracings: i) Comparison of one 12-lead ECG with another (ie, including use of serial ECGs in a patient with chest pain — and how BEST to use a prior "baseline" tracing); — and — ii) Optimal use of comparison tracing with cardiac arrhythmias! 
  • 2:50 — Let’s start with comparison of 12-Lead ECGsWhat are the problems? How to optimize the technique for comparison in time-efficient fashion?
  • 3:20 — First determine, "What are you comparing?" (ie, WHAT was going on at the time that the "prior" 12-lead ECG was done? — that is, Was the patient asymptomatic? — or — Was your "baseline" tracing recorded at the time of a previous infarction?) = WHAT are you comparing?
  • 5:25 — Moving on to serial ECGs. By correlating each ECG with whether CP (Chest Pain) was present (and if so — how severe?) — you can often tell IF the “culprit” vessel is now open or closed! 
  • KEY Point: It's essential to correlate each ECG with the status of CP at the time each tracing is recorded! (Write this on the actual ECG and in the chart – or else it will not be remembered).
  • 8:35 — Illustrating how correlating serial ECGs and the presence and severity of symptoms can diagnose an acute OMI (with need for prompt cath) — even when the initial ECG was “only" nonspecific.
  • 9:50 — How often to repeat the ECG in a patient with CP? (Answer: As often as is needed until you become certain about acute OMI or no OMI!).
  • NOTE: — Do not give morphine until you know what you will do with your patient! (ie, until you know if the cath lab needs to be activated!).
  • 10:50 — An acute evolving OMI may sometimes change in less than 5-to-10 minutes. As a result — ECGs may need to be repeated within a period of minutes! (especially IF there is a change in the presence or severity of CP).
  • 11:45 — Look for dynamic ST-T wave changes on serial tracings! These may be subtle — but when they occur in a patient presenting with CP, it is often (usually) an indication for prompt cath!

12:15 —
 My "Take" on the “optimal” time-efficient and accurate technique for comparing 12-lead ECGs? 
  • KEY Point: You have to go Lead-by-Lead from 1 tracing-to-the-2nd tracing! (because if you don’t — you will overlook subtle-but-important changes!)
  • NOTE: Careful lead-by lead comparison actually takes less time than the random way most clinicians compare 1 ECG with another. (Confession: I miss subtle "dynamic" changes when I do not do meticulous lead-by-lead comparison).
  • 14:05 — With serial 12-lead ECGs — “Be sure you are comparing apples with apples, and not with oranges”. That is — IF the frontal plane axis and/or precordial lead placement is not the same for the 2 tracings that we are comparing — this needs to be taken into account when we do serial comparison!

  • 16:50 — IF you see excessive artifact and/or other "technical misadventure" in a patient with new CP for whom you need to determine IF an acute OMI is ongoing — Repeat the ECG immediately! (ie, Don't wait to repeat the ECG ...).
  • 18:15 — Examples of technical “misadventures” (ie, Lead I should never normally show global negativity).
  • 18:40 — Regarding technical “misadventures” (ie, “Things that I wish I knew last year" — Be aware of PTA (Pulse-Tap Artifact) — which once you have seen it — can be instantly recognized! (to the amazement of your colleagues who are not aware of PTA!).

22:25 —
 Using serial tracings for optimal Rhythm interpretation! 
  • KEY Point: Look for additional simultaneously-recorded leads = “12 Leads are Better than One!” (ie, For example with tachycardias — the QRS may look narrow if all you have is 1 or 2 leads — whereas if part of the QRS lies on the baseline in the single lead you are looking at, this might be VT!).
  • 24:10 — The 5 BEST leads (in my opinion) for looking for atrial activity in a tachycardia are lead II (ie, The P must be upright in lead II if there is sinus rhythm — unless dextrocardia or lead misplacement) — and then leads V1IIIaVF; and lead aVR (these 5 leads being my “Go-To-Leads” for finding subtle flutter waves — as well as for finding subtle retrograde activity and subtle AV dissociation).
  • 25:00 — The advantage of getting a 12-lead in an unknown tachycardia = “12 Leads are Better than One” ( = You have 12 leads to tell if the QRS is wide or narrow!).
  • 26:10 — Even though initial emergency treatment of a regular SVT rhythm will be similar (if not identicalregardless of what type of SVT the rhythm is — ultimate management will be better IF at some point you can determine for certain what type of SVT rhythm this was! — Get a post-conversion 12-lead ECG — and compare this to the initial 12-lead ECG obtained during the tachycardia!
  • Doing so helps to distinguish between the 4 most Common Causes of a regular SVT at ~150/minute, but without sinus P waves = i) Sinus tach; ii) Atrial tach; iii) Reentry SVT ( = AVNRT vs orthodromic AVRT)or iv) AFlutter (which is by far, the most commonly overlooked arrhythmia!).

  • 29:20 — And my last few minutes on, "HOW does a comparison ECG help you when interpreting a regular WCT (Wide-Complex Tachycardia) rhythm?
==================
NOTE: Because of time restrictions — I did not expand on the differential diagnosis of a regular WCT rhythm — which for practical purposes is: i) VT, VT, VT until proven otherwise!; ii) SVT with either rate-related aberrant conduction or a preexisting BBB (which is where a prior tracing can be so helpful!); — or — iii) Something else! (ie, a WPW-related tachyarrhythmia — Hyperkalemia! — some toxicity)
  • See ECG Podcast #1 below for more 12-lead and problematic arrhythmia interpretation.
==================

  • 33:30 — SUMMARY by Dr. Anthony Kashou.







Tuesday, July 23, 2024

A prehospital ECG in a patient with chest pain. The paramedics tell me it is normal.

I was working at triage when the medics brought this patient who is 65 yo and has had chest pain for 12 hours.

They recorded a prehospital ECG at 2112 and said that it was “normal”.  It had already been crumpled up and put in the waste basket.  

So I uncrumpled it:

What do you think?
You need to click on it to enlarge it to view it well








I was suspicious for inferior and posterior OMI (Large T-wave in aVF, slight STE in lead III with inverted T-wave in aVL, and a slightly downsloping ST with negative T-wave in V2, and minimal STD in I, V5, and V6).  

However, this is very sublte and not diagnostic in my view.  But also very suspicious.

I recorded a triage ECG immediately on arrival at 2204, 52 minutes after the first (prehospital transport time was long):

What do you think?










I thought this was all but diagnostic, but still uncertain and I wanted to know what the Queen of Hearts thought:





If the Queen says OMI with high confidence and I am worried, then I am VERY worried.   

I took the patient to the critical care area and questioned him more on the way.  The pain had been intermittent until an hour before arrival, when he called 911.

We activated the cath lab.

Another ECG was recorded while awaiting the cath team:

Now there is STEMI


Let's look at that first (prehospital ECG) again:

Very subtle!




I wondered the next day what the Queen would have said:

OMI with high confidence!!


The first troponin I returned at 7 ng/L

The patient went for angiography and had RCA Occlusion (TIMI-0 flow).  

It was opened and stented.  

Peak trop was 7000 ng/L (since the intervention was so fast)!!


If the medics had had the Queen, the OMI would have been diagnosed 52 minutes earlier.  This was a weekend late evening, and so it took time the cath team to get in to the hospital.

A prehospital activation would have save a lot of time and would have been possible if the paramedics were using the Queen of Hearts PMCardio AI app.


Click here to sign up for Queen of Hearts Access







===================================

MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (7/23/2024):

===================================
Today's case illustrates the importance of attention to subtle serial ECG findings.
  • For clarity in Figure-1 — I've put together the 3 tracings from today's case.

Figure-1: I've put together the 3 serial tracings from today's case. (To improve visualization — I've digitized the initial ECG using PMcardio).


The Initial ECG in Figure-1:
The patient in today's case is a 65-year old man with CP (Chest Pain) over the previous 12 hours before contacting EMS. As per Dr. Smith, although the initial ECG had been interpreted as "normal" — it is clearly suspicious for OMI.
  • The rhythm in ECG #1 is sinus — with normal intervals; a normal (horizontal) frontal plane axis — and no chamber enlargement.
  • It is hard to determine if there is a QS vs an rS in lead III. That said — even if this is a QS complex, an isolated Q wave in lead III is not necessarily abnormal. No other Q waves.
  • R wave progression is normal — with transition (where the R wave becomes taller than the S wave is deep) occurring normally between leads V3-to-V4.
The subtleties in ECG #1 lie with assessment of ST-T wave changes:
  • In a patient with new CP over the past 12 hours — my "eye" was immediately drawn to lead aVF (within the RED rectangle in ECG #1). Given tiny size of the QRS complex in this lead — the T wave in lead aVF is clearly hyperacute (This T wave towers over the tiny r wave in lead aVF — and could easily "swallow" the QRS within its borders).
  • Although not quite as disproportionately enlarged as the T wave in lead aVF — the T wave in lead III looks "bulkier" than I'd expect for the QRS in this lead.
  • In the context of the clearly abnormal ST-T waves in leads III and aVF — the inverted T wave in lead aVL is consistent with a reciprocal change (Whereas T wave inversion per se is not necessarily abnormal in lead aVL — the depth of the T wave seen here is disproportionately large compared to modest height of the R wave in aVL, that is nowhere near satisfying LVH criteria).
  • In the context of abnormal leads III, aVL and aVF — the ST segment flattening with slight depression in lead I supports validity of the reciprocal change in aVL.
  • Finally — there is nonspecific ST-T wave flattening across the chest leads. By itself — this finding would not be indicative of anything acute. But in the context of the above-noted limb lead findings suggestive of inferior OMI (with onset at some point over this patient's 12-hour history of CP) — the lack of upright T waves with slight upsloping ST elevation is consistent with posterior OMI, that so often accompanies inferior OMI.

  • BOTTOM Line: As per Dr. Smith — while not diagnostic, the above subtle findings in this patient with ongoing CP over a period of hours should be viewed as highly suspicious for infero-postero OMI until proven otherwise.

The Value of Serial Tracings:
Due to prolonged transport time — the repeat ECG was not obtained until 52 minutes later ( = ECG #2).
  • KEY Point: Optimal comparison of serial tracings is achieved by looking lead-by-lead while holding both tracings right next to each other! If each of the tracings is looked at separately — it is all-too-easy to overlook subtle differences.
  • So it is with comparison of ECG #1 and ECG #2 in today's case. Seeing both tracings next to each other (as we do in Figure-1) — I thought there is a subtle-but-real increase in hyperacuity in ECG #2 — in that ST segments are straighter, with T wave "volume" being slightly (but consistently) more in leads II,III,aVF and aVL.
  • Although the slight changes in chest lead ST-T wave appearance in ECG #2 remain nonspecific — in this patient in whom we strongly suspect inferior OMI — there is no doubt that lack of the gently upsloping, slight J-point ST elevation that is normally seen in leads V2,V3 is absent.

  • BOTTOM Line: As per Dr. Smith — the cath lab should be activated.

The Final ECG:
The last ECG in today's case was recorded while awaiting cardiac catheterization.
  • The heart rate in ECG #3 has increased — with a number of PACs.
  • As per the dotted RED line — there is now clear ST elevation in lead III, as well as in the other inferior leads. This is countered by reciprocal ST-T wave changes, with an increase in the amount of J-point depression in lead aVL.
  • Although difficult to assess because of artifact with baseline wander — there now appears to be ledge-like ST depression in lead V2, consistent with ongoing posterior OMI.

  • KEY Point: As per Dr. Smith — the serial ECG changes in today's first 2 tracings are extremely subtle, until frank ST elevation is finally seen in ECG #3. But in context with the worrisome history of new CP in this 65-year old man — these subtle ECG findings in ECGs #1 and #2 should be sufficient to recognize the need for prompt cath
  • The BEST way to get good at recognizing these important early ECG clues — is to Go Back after you know the answer — to LOOK AGAIN at ECG #1 — then ECG #2 — and SEE how these initially subtle findings evolve into the obvious acute MI evident in ECG #3
 




Sunday, July 21, 2024

What are treatment options for this rhythm, when all else fails?

Written By Magnus Nossen — with edits by Ken Grauer and Smith.


The patient in today’s case is a previously healthy 40-something male who contacted EMS due to acute onset crushing chest pain. The pain was 10/10 in intensity radiating bilaterally to the shoulders and also to the left arm and neck. The below ECG was recorded. 





The ECG shows obvious STEMI(+) OMI due to probable proximal LAD occlusion. 

The magnitude and distribution of ST elevation and ST depression is very concerning. There is massive ST elevation in lead V1 and V2 with diminishing degree of ST elevation toward V4. Leads II, III, aVF and V6 all show a large amount of ST depression. Lead I shows slight STE, and a hyperacute T wave — while lead aVL has significant ST elevation. This ECG does not have the typical ST-vector of an LAD occlusion. 

==============================
See below for Ken Grauer Comment on the initial ECG:
======================================


Continuation of the case: The patient was accepted for primary PCI. He arrived ill-appearing, hypotensive with cool and clammy skin. He was taken immediately to the cath lab. Below is the initial angiography image. It shows a proximal LAD occlusion, in conjunction with a subtotally occluded LMCA (Left Main Coronary Artery). The RCA was occluded proximally with retrograde filling from the LCx. You can see the how poorly the contrast is defined on the below image signifying severely decreased contrast flow through the stenotic LMCA.


You can see Left Main and Proximal LAD obstruction, but with some flow, which is saving this patient's life.



Immediately after contrast injection into the LMCA, the patient had circulatory collapse, with a precipitous drop in blood pressure. Epinephrine infusion was begun.  An Impella device was placed to maintain cardiac output and perfusion pressures.  Subsequent PCI of the LMCA and LAD was performed. Below is the post-PCI angio image (the orientation is slightly different explanining why now the LAD is shown below the LCx). The image shows the impella device in place. After PCI — there was acceptable flow in the LM, LAD and LCx arteries.




Angiography
  • LMCA — 90-99% osteal stenosis. 
  • LAD — 100% proximal occlusion; with 70-89% mid-vessel narrowing. 
  • LCx — 50-69% stenosis of the 1st marginal branch; with 100% distal LCx occlusion. 
  • RCA — 100% proximal occlussion.




The patient in today’s case presented in cardiogenic shock from proximal LAD occlusion, in conjunction with a subtotally stenosed LMCA. The RCA was occluded proximally — and was being filled retrograde from the left-sided vessels. Upon contrast injection of the LMCA, the patient deteriorated, as the LMCA was severely diseased and flow to all coronary arteries (LAD, LCx and RCA) was compromised. 


Following PCI — the patient became uncooperative and agitated, and needed intubation. Over the next couple of days the patient was weaned off of mechanical circulatory support. Inotropic medication was continued. Troponin T peaked at 38,398 ng/L ( = a very large myocardial infarction)



The echo images below were obtained on the day of presentation after PCI. Cardiac function is poor, with akinesis of the LAD territory. The impella catheter is seen in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT).





Below is a repeat Echo of the left ventricle in the apical 4-chamber view. (This was recorded a number of days later). By comparison — you can appreciate the difference in contractility in the LAD territory, and overall systolic performance of the LV.





The patient was extubated on Day-3 of the hospital stay. Unfortunately, he required re-intubation a few days later due to respiratory distress from severe bilateral pneumonia. The stay in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) was further complicated by sepsis, delirium, GI bleeding, and anuric renal failure with need for renal replacement therapy.


The patient improved, and on Day-11 of the hospital stay — he was off inotropes and on a small dose of a ß-blocker. However, he suddenly developed a series of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. This progressed to electrical storm, with incessant PolyMorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (PMVT) and recurrent episodes of Ventricular Fibrillation  (VFib). He required multiple defibrillations within a period of a few hours. Below are printouts of some of the arrhythmias recorded. What do you think?





The above ECG shows a run of PMVT that terminates on its own. 3 sinus-conducted beats ensue — before another run of  PMVT occurs. Both episodes are initiated by an "R-on-T" phenomenon. The sinus conducted beats show a completed anterior wall MI, with QS waves in the precordial leads. There is no definite evidence of acute ischemia. (ie, No excessive ST elevation or hyperacute T waves). QRS morphology in leads V1-thru-V3 manifests features resembling Brugada morphology. 


The tracing below followed:



This 12-lead ECG above shows another episode of PMVT. This time, the arrhythmia did not spontaneously terminate — but rather degenerated to VFib, requiring  defibrillation.



===============================


Discussion

Today's patient manifests multiple episodes of PMVT and VFib. Sinus-conducted beats in the above examples show a normal QTc interval. This is an important finding related to the etiology and treatment of these malignant arrhythmias — since by definition, PMVT with a prolonged QTc is classified as Torsades de Pointes (and entails different treatment recommendations).



The schematic grouping below reviews classification of PMVT types: 




In today's case — the sinus-conducted beats prior to and between the episode of PMVT show evidence of completed anterior wall MI. That said — there is no evidence on ECG of re-occlusion of the infarct artery. In both tracings — an exceedingly fast PMVT is documented. The arrhythmia starts with a PVC having a short coupling interval. The R-R intervals of the VT are less than 200ms and ventricular rate > 300 bpm! (Distinction of PMVT vs VFib is an academic one in this case). Both PMVT and VFib occurred multiple times. Some episodes of PMVT would terminate spontaneously — but on many occasions, the PMVT degenerated to VFib, requiring defibrillation. 


The situation in today's case was of a critically ill young man with an exceedingly electrically unstable myocardium. Simply stated — the patient was having recurrent PMVT without QTc prolongation, and without evidence of ongoing transmural ischemia. (If there had been ECG findings indicating reocclusion of the artery — an angiogram would have been warranted). Some residual ischemia in the infarct border might still be present. There was no evidence bradycardia leading up to the runs of PMVT (as tends to occur with Torsades). If there had been — a temporary atrial pacemaker could have been considered as a way of increasing the heart rate to suppress a bradycardia-dependent arrhythmia ("overdrive pacing"). 




QUESTION:

  • How will you handle this arrhythmia given the clinical scenario?


NOTE: This patient was already on a low-dose ß-blocker. IV Amiodarone was ordered — but did not reduce the frequency of ventricular ectopics or the number of VT episodes. The patient continued in arrhythmic storm with recurring PMVT and VFib episodes. 



  • What are additional treatment options?



Our Thoughts:

Incessant PMVT is notoriously difficult to treat. It can be resistant to cardioversion — and often responds poorly to antiarrhytmic drugs when compared to monomorphic VT. A high-dose, short-acting ß-blocker should be tried. An ultra short-acting ß-blocker such as Esmolol, can be given as by IV infusion (ie, as a loading dose of 500mcg/kg — followed by an infusion of 50mcg/kg/min). Due to its short half-life, the drug easily be titrated and/or discontinued if not tolerated. Intubation and sedation with propofol is warranted if not already done to decrease sympathetic drive and discomfort to the patient. 

Today's patient was hypotensive and recently weaned off of inotropic support. IV Metoprolol was given without apparent effect on ectopy incidence and arrhythmia. The patient was already intubated and sedated. The decision was made to try Quinidine (as this case was felt to represent conditions consistent with Quinidine-responsive PMVT).


Quinidine-Responsive PMVT — is a well described entity (Viskin et al — Circulation 139(20), 2019 — and — Viskin et al —  Circulation 144(10), 2021) — that occurs during the "healing phase" after acute MI, in which the arrhythmia originates in Purkinje cells (which explains why this ventricular arrhythmia tends to be so responsive to Type 1A drugs like Quinidine). Mechanistically — Quinidine is a strong blocker of the transient outward potassium current. This is relevant because transient outward potassium current channels are highly expressed in Purkinje fibers.

  • In contrast, conventional treatment of this type of ventricular arrhythmia with agents including ÃŸ-blockers, Amiodarone, Magnesium and Lidocaine — all-too-often fails
  • Studies of patients with coronary artery disease who developed arrhythmic storm with episodes of PMVT following MI — show arrhythmias indistinguishable from those reported in this case. In such cases — radiofrequency ablation of ectopic beats triggering malignant ventricular arrhythmias was needed for control of arrhythmic storm because the antiarrhythmic medications tried were ineffective (Marrouche et al — JACC 5;43(9): 1715-20, 2004).
  • Of interest — the ectopic beats triggering PMVT/VFib in such studies were often mapped to endocardial sites displaying Purkinje potentials within the myocardial scar — suggesting potential responsivity to a 1A agent (Nogami — Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34(8): 1034-1049, 2011).



Today's patient was started on oral Quinidine-Sulfate (400mg x 4/day) — with a rapid cessation of all PMVT and VFib episodes. In a case like today’s all contraindications are relative if the drug you are giving is effective as the underlying entity you are treating is deadly if not controlled.


The most common side effects of Quinidine is hypotension and QTc prolongation. These are also the most commonly reported findings in toxic overdoses with ventricular arrhythmias being reported as the leading cause of death. Information is scarce when it comes to what constitutes a toxic dose. Numbers given are based mostly on case reposts. Lethality reported from ingestion of 5 grams in a toddler while survival after ingestion of 8 grams has been reported in an adolescent.



What About Procainamide? 

The PROCAMIO study included hemodynamically stable patients in VT. In this study — Procainamide was superior to Amiodarone for terminating monomorphic VT, as well as having fewer adverse effects than Amiodarone (Ortiz et al — Eur Heart J 1;38 (17): 1329-1335, 2017).


Procainamide, like Quinidine is a Type 1A antiarrhythmic. Because Procainamide is not marketed in Norway — I have no experience using this agent. 

  • In the United States (and in other locations where Quinidine is not readily available) — Procainamide would seem the recommended choice to consider for arrhythmias like those in today's case, especially if not responding to the usual antiarrhythmic regimen.


===============================

Smith comment: I agree with starting with a beta blocker such as esmolol, since this is likely to be a hyper-catecholaminergic state. Another approach is sympathetic chain (stellate ganglion) blockade if you have the skills to do it: it requires some expertise and ultrasound guidance. If these do not work, the a type 1a anti-dysrhythmic is certainly a reasonable choice (procainamide, or in Norway, quinidine).  Administration of Procainamide is 10-17 mg/kg at 20 mg/min.  A 1000 mg dose will take 50 minutes.)  One should infuse until:  1) good effect, or 2) hypotension or 3) increase in QRS duration to 1.5x baseline (this is what most recommend but seems like far too much QRS widening to me)

===============================



See these articles and this graphic:


1. A Multicenter Study of Stellate Ganglion Block as a Temporizing Treatment for Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias 


2. Stellate ganglion blockade for the management of ventricular arrhythmia storm






CASE Conclusion:

Today's patient ultimately made a full recovery — and was discharged home. An ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrilator) was placed prior to discharge. Quinidine eventually was discontinued due to development of hemolytic anemia. Additional follow-up was not available. 



Learning points 

  • PMVT following MI can be very difficult to treat. Quinidine (or perhaps Procainamide if Quinidine not available) might be considered as an option for refractory cases, especially if other methods tried were not effective. 

  • When dealing with recurrent episodes of PMVT — attention to the QTc interval of sinus-conducted beats is essential for distinction between Torsades vs other types of PMVT. 


See this article on polymorphic VT


This review of anti arrhythmic drugs is worth a read






===================================

MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (7/21/2024):

===================================
Intriguing post by Dr. Nossen — in which he discusses a case of incessant VT with multiple PMVT/VFib episodes that occurred post-MI, in a patient with a normal QTc who failed to respond the usual antiarrhythmic treatment — but which immediately responded to treatment with Quinidine! (See my Addendum Note below).
  • I focus my comment on the initial ECG in today's case — which I've reproduced and labeled in Figure-1

The dramatic nature of the ECG in Figure-1 is immediately apparent. I'll draw attention to the following:
  • The pattern of at the very least proximal LAD occlusion — is evident from marked ST elevation beginning in lead V1 — attaining peak amplitude in lead V2 — and continuing until lead V4. 
  • Proximal left coronary artery occlusion is supported from limb lead findings of marked ST elevation in lead aVL (with a hyperacute ST-T wave in lead I) — and even more dramtic reciprocal ST depression in each of the inferior leads.
  • Cath findings shown above in Dr. Nossen's discussion confirm multi-vessel disease, including 90-99% osteal stenosis of the LMCA. As we've often emphasized on Dr. Smith's ECG Blog — it is rare in practice to see LMCA occlusion, because most such patients die before reaching the hospital. Nevertheless, this entity does occur on occasion — and it is important to appreciate its ECG presentation. As I review in My Comment in the January 16, 2020 post of Dr. Smith's ECG Blog (and have reproduced in Figure-2 below) — the ECG of patients with acute LMCA occlusion may be varied. Today's extensive ST-T wave elevation and depression (with ST elevation in lead aVR) — is consistent with one of these patterns.  

While clearly not needed for diagnosis — today's initial ECG is an instructive tracing in that it illustrates:
  • Precordial "Swirl" — for which Drs. Meyers and Smith illustrate 20 example cases vs "look-alikes" of Swirl (with my synthesis of "Swirl" ECG findings in My Comment on that post) from October 15, 2022. In Figure-1 from today's case — the coved ST elevation in lead V1 vs the nearly mirror-image opposite ST depression in lead V6 present as marked an example of acute septal ischemia as I've encountered.
  • T-QRS-D (Terminal-QRS-Distortion) — with my RED arrows highlighting as marked an example of T-QRS-D as I've encountered. Drs. Smith and Meyers emphasize that this ECG finding is diagnostic of acute OMI when seen in leads V2 and/or V3 (and probably also in lead V4) — though the picture of T-QRS-D seen in lead aVL of Figure-1 clearly tells a similar story (See My Comment at the bottom of the page in the November 14, 2019 post in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog — for illustrative description of T-QRS-D).
Figure-1: I've labeled the initial ECG in today's case. (To improve visualization — I've digitized the original ECG using PMcardio).


===================================

Below in Figure-2 — I've reproduced the Table from My Comment in the January 16, 2020 post of Dr. Smith's ECG Blog that highlights potential ECG findings of acute LMCA occlusion.


Figure-2: Reasons for the varied ECG presentation of acute LMain occlusion — excerpted from Dr. Smith’s 8/9/2019 post (See text).


======================================

Addendum Note: 


Quinidine has a long history of use to treat cardiac arrhythmias and severe malaria. My understanding is that the IV formulation of Quinidine is no longer readily available (if manufactured at all) in the US. In today's patient (who was treated in Norway) — Oral Quinidine was used.

  • Oral Quinidine is available in sulfate or gluconate formulations. Rapid-acting oral formulations begin to work within 1-3 hours. The most common adverse effects are GI (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) — and these are usually drug limiting. 
  • Principal adverse cardiac effects of Quinidine include QRS widening and QTc prolongation. With longterm use there may be — bradycardia, AV conduction defects and risk of Torsades de Pointes (especially in patients also on Digoxin). Other adverse effects may be seen (Today's patient ultimately stopped the drug due to hemolytic anemia).
  • Although used extensively as an antiarrhythmic agent in the past in the U.S. — the adverse effect profile of Quindine, and the greater efficacy of other antiarrhythmic agents have limited longterm Quinidine use (at least in the U.S.) for this purpose. That said — the drug worked wonders for treatment of today's patient! (who had otherwise resistant ventricular arrhythmias!).

 

IV Procainamide is used in the United States. 

  • During the years that I used the drug — the dosing regimen I favored was to give 100 mg IV slowly over 5 minutes (at ~20 mg/minute) — until one of the following end points is reached: i) The arrhythmia is suppressed; ii) Hypotension occurs; iii) The QRS widens by 50%; — and/or — iv) A total loading dose of 500-1,000 mg has been given. This may be followed with IV infusion at 2 mg/minute (1-4 mg/minute range).
  • NOTE: Although the maximal rate for IV Procainamide infusion has been limited to 50 mg/minute — adverse effects (ie, hypotension, bradycardia, QRS widening) are less at slower infusion rates (ie, of ~20 mg/minute).








Recommended Resources