Thursday, February 6, 2025

Electrical instability in a healthy 50 year old. How to manage?

Written by Magnus Nossen 

    (with 2 important comments by Smith at the bottom)


The patient in today’s case is a 50 year old man who presented due to "dizziness" and episodes of presyncope. 
  • The patient's symptoms had started about 14 days prior to admission — but worsened significantly during the course of the last 24 hours. 
  • Previously healthy, taking no medication and exercising regularly. 
  • No anginal symptoms asymptomatic during physical exercise.  


Below in Figure-1 is this patient's admission ECG. How will you manage this patient?

Figure-1: Today's initial ECG (Cabrera layout, paper speed 25mm/sec.).



Interpretation: This 12-lead ECG shows sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 65 beats/minute with frequent unifocal PVCs. The sinus conducted beats have a normal PR interval and are narrow with slight ST elevation in V2. This ST-elevation is benign in appearance. The QTc is normal. Of note are the multiple premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The ectopic beats can be seen isolated, coupled and in short salvos of 3 beats.

The PVCs have an LBBB-like morphology in the early precordial leads. The QRS axis is superior and towards the left shoulder. (ie, negative QRS complexes in the inferior leads — and positive in leads I and aVL). The axis and morphology of the PVCs are consistent with an origin of the premature ventricular beats somewhere near the apex of the right ventricle. The axis is not compatible with RVOT ectopic beats, which should have an inferior axis. Of note is the slight beat-to-beat variation in the PVC morphology (More on this later in the post).

PVCs originating in the right ventricle will have an LBBB-like QRS morphology in the precordial leads — whereas PVCs from the left ventricle will show RBBB-like morphology.

Whenever I see PVCs with the morphology and axis seen in todays case — I always look for signs of AC (Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy). Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy often manifests with PVCs from the RV. The ECG in Figure-1 however, shows no signs of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. See this case for an in-depth discussion of AC and an example of VT and ECG changes associated with this disorder. 
  • During observation in the ED the patient had multiple self-terminating runs of Non-Sustained monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT). 
  • IV metoprolol boluses were administered without any effect on the ventricular ectopy. Potassium and magnesium serum levels were normal.
  • Bedside echo was challenging simply due the frequency of ectopic beats — but did not reveal any pathology. 
  • A 150mg IV bolus of amiodarone was added to the IV metoprolol without any effect. Following this, an IV amiodarone infusion of 1200mg/24 hours was started.

Figure-2 below shows a consecutive recording of a single long lead II rhythm strip. There are 6 lines, each 30 seconds long. Each line is followed immediately by the one beneath it. The recording makes up a 3-minute rhythm strip. This tracing was obtained after initial treatment with an IV ß-blocker, amiodarone and magnesium sulfate.

Figure-2: Continuous 3-minute, long lead II rhythm strip — recorded after initial treatment. 

It is obvious from Figure-2 that treatment up to this point is not having the desired effect. On the contrary, the incidence and duration of VT was increasing (!) despite treatment. The patient was constantly dizzy, and the PVCs and runs of NSVT were associated with no more than faint pulses on the arterial line. 


How can you stabilize this patient? What will be your next measure?


You have given IV MgSO4 — a fast acting ß-blocker — and IV amiodarone bolus and infusion. 

  • The possibility of an ischemic cause of the ventricular arrhythmia has to be considered! That said — there were no clinical symptoms or ECG findings suggestive of ongoing ischemia. Troponin T was negative on admission and on repeat blood draw. 


Therefore — A different approach is needed. There are 2 main options:

  • Overdrive pacing could be considered — and in the right clinical situation, this is often effective for reducing ventricular arrhythmias (especially in the case of preventing pause induced or bradycardia-induced arrhythmias in association with QTc prolongation).
  • Try a different kind of antiarrhythmic. This is what was done in today's case. The intricacies of the different classes of antiarrhythmics and their mechanism of action extend beyond the scope of this blog. I limit myself to the summarized overview in Figure-3 of antiarrhythmic agents and their principle site of action. 


Figure-3: Vaughan-Williams Classification of antiarrhythmic agents.


The CASE Continues:
It was decided to try a sodium channel blocker that acts primarily on the ventricular myocardium. Intravenous administration was sought for rapid onset of action. 
  • IV lidocaine was given as a 100 mg bolus, followed by a continuous infusion. A few minutes after the bolus was administered, there was no more NSVT! In fact, after the bolus was completed — there were hardly any PVCs at all.

The patient was continued on IV lidocaine infusion until the next AM, at which point it was stopped. The plan was to try flecainide if symptoms recurred. If successful, this medication is much easier to give as an oral preparation. 
  • The patient remained free of PVCs for several hours after the lidocaine was stopped. 
  • Echocardiography was done and was completely normal. 

Approximately 10 hours after lidocaine infusion was stopped — multiple PVCs and runs of NSVT reappeared, increasing dramatically within a short time span.
  • The patient was loaded with 100mg IV flecainide. 

Below in Figure-4 is the rhythm strip immediately recorded after initiation of the IV flecainide infusion. Again, there are 6 lines, each 30 seconds long. Each line is followed immediately by the one beneath it.


Figure-4: Long lead II 3-minute rhythm strip after initiation of IV flecainide. PVCs and short runs of NSVT are extremely frequent for the first half of the recording.


Following initiation of flecainide infusion — there was a nearly immediate and virtual complete cessation of PVCs and NSVT! 
  • The patient was transitioned to oral flecainide. He has since been free of PVCs. 
  • Below in Figure-5 — is a 10-minute continuous lead II recording on oral Flecainide, now showing sinus bradycardia without a single PVC! 


Figure-5: Long lead II recording on oral flecainide (10 minutes of continuous recording — each line being 1-minute long). No PVCs are seen.


A workup was undertaken in search of a cause of the patient's ventricular arrhythmia.
  • As noted above — echocardiography was completely normal. 
  • CT coronary angiogram showed a hypoplastic RCA and dominant LCx. There were no plaques or stenoses. 
  • Once the arrhythmia was under control — cardiac MRi was performed. The MRi was completely normal without any early or late enhancement and without any signs of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. 
  • The patient has been scheduled for a PVC ablation procedure. This patient very likely has some form of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. 

Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia: 
Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia occurs in patients with structurally normal hearts — in the absence of other identifiable cause such as channelopathy or cardiomyopathy. 
  • There are many different types of idiopathic VTs with the outflow tract ventricular tachycardias (OT-VT) being most common. Of the ventricular outflow tract tachycardias — (RVOT-VT) makes up 80-90%. 
  • Idiopathic VT is not limited to the outflow tract tachycardias however — as it can arise from other sites in the myocardium or conduction system. The list is extensive and includes but (but is not limited to) fascicular VT, annular VT, bundle branch VT and (what perhaps is the most likely diagnosis in todays case) — moderator band ventricular tachycardia.

Moderator Band VT: 
MB-VT exits near the apicolateral RV and therefore exhibits a LBBB morphology. The QRS morphology can have subtle variation (as seen in our case) — which may be a tip-off due to varying exits and fusion. 
  • The axis is leftward and superior, with a predominantly positive QRS in lead I and negative QRS in the inferior leads. 
  • Given early involvement of the specialized conduction system — the QRS may be relatively narrow with a sharp upstroke. However, this is dependent on the exit site — and the QRS could be wide if the exit is closer to the RV free wall. 
  • Precordial transition is typically later than V4

A common feature of MB-VT is discordance between the inferior leads, with a dominant positive deflection in lead II and a negative deflection in lead III (because the VT is exiting closer to lead III). This was not seen in today's case.
  • The differential diagnosis, especially in younger patients, includes atriofascicular tachycardia also known as "Mahaim" tachycardia.   

The idiopathic VTs are an interesting group of arrhythmias! See the September 14, 2018 post for a nice overview of this subject by Dr. Meyers. I list below links to other cases of idiopathic VT from Dr Smith's ECG blog.





Discussion: 
The diagnosis and management of the idiopathic VTs are predicated on an understanding of the mechanism, relevant cardiac anatomy, and associated ECG signatures. Our patient was referred for EP study with a plan of PVC ablation if possible. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias generally have a favorable prognosis when compared to non-idiopathic VT. The various idiopathic VTs usually can be controlled well with medical treatment and/or catheter ablation therapy. Most patients can be managed without and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)


In patients with PVCs/VT and a presentation not typical for an idiopathic origin — cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) should be considered, even if the Echo is normal. 

  • Beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or flecainide should be considered when catheter ablation is not available, not desired, or is particularly risky. 
  • Catheter ablation or flecainide should be considered in symptomatic patients with idiopathic VT/PVCs from an origin other than the RVOT or the left fascicles. [1]



Considerations Regarding Use of Flecainide: 

A 12-lead ECG is mandatory before starting therapy. It is reasonable to perform an echocardiogram to evaluate LV function. Flecainide displays use-dependence, whereby it blocks voltage-gated sodium channels more at higher heart rates. This is why exercise stress testing is sometimes performed to ensure the drug does not cause significant QRS prolongation or precipitate Brugada ECG pattern at higher heart rates.


In general, it is strongly suggested to test the first dose under medical observation. The minimum effective plasma concentration of flecainide is about 200 ng/mL. The optimal range is between 200 ng/mL and 400 ng/mL. This plasma concentration leads to a QRS prolongation of about 10 msec. A prolongation of 40 msec or more is associated with and increased probability of cardiovascular adverse effects.


Smith comment-1: The primary side-effect of flecainide is sudden death. So you must be VERY careful before initiating a patient on this medication.  It is particularly dangerous in patients with low EF. In 2016, I doubled the number of night shifts and suddenly was having 10,000 PVCs per day, very distressingly symptomatic.  After a normal stress echo and normal MRI, my electrophysiologist put me on Flecainide. Within 1/2 hour of taking one tablet, all PVCs completely disappeared. He then insisted that I do another stress test, and I got my heart rate to 173 without any QRS widening. He then was satisfied that I would be safe on flecainide. Not too long after that, I stopped doing night shifts altogether and did not need the flecainide any more!!

----See the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) trial: patients with low EF and many chronic PVCs were trialed on anti-dysrhythmics.  Those whose PVC frequency decreased were randomized to Flecainide, Encainide, Moricizine, or Placebo.  The patients who received the anti-dysrhythmic (compared to placebo) had far more sudden death.


Smith comment-2: Another adverse effect from flecainide is atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction (if you happen to go into atrial flutter, the flecainide slows the flutter rate such that it is slow enough to conduct throught the AV node at 1:1 — and you can end up with a ventricular rate of 220!! ). Therefore, many cardiologists routinely add an AV nodal blocker when they start a patient on flecainide.  


See here: Narrow Complex Tachycardia at a Rate of 220


Below is a Practical Approach to Flecainide Dosing:
  • Exclude contraindications such as structural heart disease; symptomatic bradycardia; 2nd-degree or high-degree AV block; QRS >120 msec.; and Brugada syndrome.
  • Record an ECG and calculate the QRS duration.
  • Administer a loading oral dose of 250 mg (200 mg if the weight is lower than 70 kg).
  • At plasma concentration peak (after 90–120 min.) — record another ECG and calculate the QRS duration.
======================
  1. If the QRS duration is increased by less than 20 msec. — prescribe 100mg twice daily or 200 mg once daily. Check ECG again after one week.
  2. If the QRS duration is increased between 20 and 40 msec., or is wider than 120 msec — prescribe 50 mg twice daily or 100 mg once daily. Check again the ECG after 5 days.
  3. If the QRS duration is increased more than 40 msec., or is wider than 130 msec., or a Brugada pattern is detected — consider flecainide as contraindicated in that patient.
  4. An exercise stress test while taking the drug can be performed ensure that the QRS does not increase further at higher heart rates (ie, as a result of flecainide's use-dependence).
====================== 

References:


[1] 2022 ESC Guidelines for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Key Points - American College of Cardiology. (2022, September 2)


[2] Ward, R. C., Van Zyl, M., & DeSimone, C. V. (2023). Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Journal of Clinical Medicine12(3), 930. 


[3] Lavalle, C. et. al. (2021). Flecainide How and When: A Practical guide in supraventricular arrhythmias. Journal of Clinical Medicine10(7), 1456.






===================================
MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (2/6/2025):
===================================
I found today's case by Dr. Nossen intriguing, if not fascinating — because this previously healthy, middle-aged man with repetitive runs of NSVT proved resistant to multiple medications until finally responding to Flecainide. I thought this case raised a number of important clinical issues:
  • What is idiopathic VT?
  •     — Does this patient have idiopathic VT?
  •             — Why should we care if this is idiopathic VT?

WHAT is Idiopathic VT?
We've periodically reviewed cases of idiopathic VT, in which otherwise healthy, younger adults without underlying heart disease present with VT (See my Audio Pearl and consolidated summary of this entity in Figure-7 of the ADDENDUM below — as well as comments in the February 14, 2022 post).
  • As per Dr. Nossen — over 80% of idiopathic VT cases are the result of RVOT VT. Fascicular VTs make up many of the remaining cases — with both of these forms being readily recognizable based on QRS morphology — and with both often responding to specific medical treatment (as per Figure-7 below).
  • But not all forms of idiopathic VT are predictable based on their ECG appearance. Was today's case one of those unpredictable forms?

Today's Initial ECG (that I've reproduced in Figure-6):
As per Dr. Nossen — sinus-conducted beats in today's initial ECG had a benign appearance (normal PR interval; narrow QRS, upright T waves with slight anterior ST elevation consistent with a repolarization variant). 
  • Interesting features in this initial tracing included subtle underlying AV dissociation (PINK arrows highlighting the subtle deflections of partially-hidden on-time sinus P waves) — with periodic slight PR interval prolongation of some sinus-conducted beats due to "concealed" conduction following some PVCs (No evidence of AV block!).
  • I thought QRS morphology of ventricular beats to be atypical for "idiopathic" VT in a patient ostensibly without underlying heart disease because: i) Ventricular beats are extremely wide (approaching 0.16 second in leads I,II,V5); andii) Although QRS morphology resembles LBBB conduction in the limb leads — the initial R wave in anterior chest leads is larger and wider than expected for LBBB conduction — and QRS morphology is bizarre in lateral chest leads V5,V6 (the vertical RED line highlighting onset of the QRS).

Figure-6: I've labeled the initial ECG in today's case.



Underlying Heart Disease?

As per Dr. Nossen — evaluation included:

  • normal Echo.
  • CT angiogram — showing a "hypoplastic" RCA and dominant LCx (with distinction between what is a "smaller" RCA in a left-dominant circulation vs an RCA with a lumen that is "too small" sometimes being difficult).
  • Cardiac MRI — completely normal.
  • Upcoming EP study (hopefully allowing for ablative VT treatment).

Given more-than-expected QRS widening with unusual QRS morphology for ventricular ectopy on today's initial ECG, followed by resistance to multiple antiarrhythmic agents — I wondered if mention of an underdeveloped RCA on CT angiogram might reflect underlying heart abnormality in the form of HCAD (Hypoplastic Coronary Artery Disease)?
  • Although rare — reduced lumen size of one or more coronary arteries has been reported as a cause of sudden death as its initial presentation in previously healthy young adults (See MacFarland et al — J Card Cases 4(3): E148-151, 2011 — and — Guo et al — JACC 17(18)- 2021).

================================= 

ADDENDUM: Summary on the usual forms of idiopathic VT.
  • CLICK HERE — for my 8-minute Audio on Pearls for ECG Recognition of Idiopathic VT (with special attention to RVOT VT and Fascicular VT — which are the 2 most common forms).

Figure-2: Review of KEY features regarding Idiopathic VT.











Tuesday, February 4, 2025

Syncope and a short pause on event monitor

Written by Willy Frick

A middle aged man was inspecting the food in his (closed) oven when he felt a few moments of light-headedness. He subsequently woke up on the ground, unsure how long he had been unconscious. He presented for evaluation where inpatient workup including monitoring on telemetry was unremarkable. He was discharged with an event monitor and electrophysiology follow up.

The event monitor lasted for four weeks and showed almost no abnormalities, but the following strip was recorded.


What do you think?




Is the finding of just 3 blocked P waves on a 4 week event monitor enough to warrant permanent pacing?






Answer: YES. Remember that even a single episode of cardiac syncope at the wrong time (e.g. while driving) is enough to kill.

If the block is not vagal in nature, the patient should receive a pacemaker. Why do I make this distinction?

There was a randomized trial to determine whether pacemakers could benefit patients with vasovagal syncope, aptly named The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). Patients with 6+ episodes of syncope and positive tilt table test were randomized 1:1 to pacemaker versus no pacemaker. What did they find?

(From VPS — Connolly et al  JACC, 1999 )

Major benefit to pacing! The relative risk of syncope was reduced by over 85%! The number needed to treat was 2. We almost never see benefit this profound! So...Why don't we pace patients with vasovagal syncope?

Answer: There was no sham control. Half the patients in VPS knew they had a fancy implanted computer to help the heart beat and prevent passing out. And half the patients knew they did NOT get such a device. Fortunately, this study was repeated with sham control. In the repeat study (VPS II), EVERY patient had an implanted pacemaker. Half of the pacemakers had pacing enabled, and half the pacemakers were set to sensing only without pacing. Most importantly, neither the patients nor the doctors knew which patients got which treatment, maintaining appropriate blinding. What did the authors find in VPS II?

(From VPS II — Connolly et al  JAMA, 2003 )

Answer: No significant reduction in syncope!! A stunning result. One of many examples in medical history that remind us of the importance of blinding in clinical trials. Why was there no benefit? Perhaps because the bradycardia in vasovagal syncope is only one part of the autonomic response. There is also systemic vasodilation resulting in transient hypotension and cerebral hypoperfusion. This is why we do not routinely pace patients with vasovagal syncope.

Back to the case:

Can we say any more about the cause of block here? Could it be vagal?


This is known as "paroxysmal atrioventricular block" due to a phenomenon called "phase 4 aberrancy." The short explanation is that a premature beat resets the His. The ensuing (very slight) prolongation in cycle length prolongs the duration of spontaneous diastolic depolarization in phase 4 of the action potential, rendering it refractory. Phase 4 block is also referred to as "bradycardia dependent block." It remains refractory until another extrasystole (escape beat, PVC, PAC, etc.) resets the His, allowing it to resume conduction. If you wish to read more about this, check out the references section at the bottom, especially the articles by Lee and Pillai. 

In the example above, the first PVC (boxed in red below) depolarizes the His at an unfavorable time rendering it refractory. Then three sinus P waves (black arrows) are blocked. Finally, a second ventricular extrasystole (boxed in blue) resets the His, and the next sinus P wave (orange arrow) marks the resumption of 1:1 AV conduction.


The way to recognize this type of block is that it both initiates and terminates with an extrasystole, and there is typically very little change in the underlying sinus rate. By contrast, vagal blocks are accompanied by slowing of the sinus rate.

The patient was given strict guidance not to drive, operate machinery, etc. and was scheduled for pacemaker implantation.

Learning points:
  • Diagnose phase 4 block, an indication for permanent pacing
  • Explain why we do not routinely pace patients with vasovagal syncope
  • Review VPS and VPS II, a historical lesson in the importance of sham control

References:

Connolly, S. J., Sheldon, R., Thorpe, K. E., Roberts, R. S., Ellenbogen, K. A., Wilkoff, B. L., Morillo, C., & Gent, M. (2003). Pacemaker therapy for prevention of syncope in patients with recurrent severe vasovagal syncope: Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS II): a randomized trial. JAMA289(17), 2224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.17.2224 

Connolly, S., Sheldon, R., Roberts, R., & Gent, M. (1999). The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). Journal of the American College of Cardiology33(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00549-x 

Lee, S., Wellens, H. J. J., & Josephson, M. E. (2009). Paroxysmal atrioventricular block. Heart Rhythm6(8), 1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.001 

Pillai, A., Ellenbogen, K. A., & Padala, S. K. (2021). A tale of 2 blocks. Circulation143(10), 1062–1065. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.052981 




===================================

MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (2/4/2025): 

===================================
Enlightening case by Dr. Frick — with lifesaving chance occurrence of a single short pause over a 4-week period of monitoring, without which the probable result would have been a preventable sudden (and unexplained) death of the patient.

Looking Closer:  The Single Short Pause ...
It is indeed uncanny that an otherwise negative 4-week period of monitoring captured such a "textbook picture" of PAVB (Paroxysmal AtrioVentricular Block) — in which we see both the onset of the several second ventricular pause precipitated by a slightly early ventricular beat (labeled "X" in my Figure-1) — as well as the offset of the pause prompted by a 2nd earlier-than-expected ventricular beat (labeled "Y" in my Figure-1).
  • As per Dr. Frick — the primary cause of one or more abrupt pauses with PAVB is a result of a diseased His-Purkinje system. That today's patient may be predisposed to this disorder is suggested in Figure-1 by: i) Obvious QRS widening on this single-lead ECG monitoring strip (suggesting some form of bundle branch block); — andii) 1st-Degree AV Block of conducted beats (PR interval ~0.26 second).
  • Although the continuous rhythm strip in Figure-1 does not manifest slowing of the atrial rate prior to onset of the ventricular pause (ie, the atrial rate is fairly constant at ~66/minute in the first 2 lines of the rhythm strip) — there is a change in the atrial rate after the return of 1:1 AV conduction (in the form of slight acceleration of the atrial rate to ~81/minute for 6 beats — until resumption of the slower atrial rate at the end of the 3rd line). So, perhaps a component of vagal influence may be operative after all? (ie, 1st-degree AV block — and some rate variability).
  • "Devil's Advocate" — Beat "Y" actually looks like a fusion beat (intermediate in morphology between sinus-conducted beats and early ventricular beat "X" ) — which if true, would make for an immediate "reset" of His-Purkinje conduction.

Figure-1: I've labeled today's continuous rhythm strip.



Paroxysmal AtrioVentricular Block (PAVB):
As suggested by Dr. Frick's discussion — and described by Bansal et al (J Arrhythmia 35:870-872, 2019) and Bosah et al (Cureus 14[7]: e27092, 2022) — the entity known as PAVB is a potential cause of syncope that is easily overlooked, and which is potentially lethal (probably more often than is commonly realized).
  • PAVB is characterized by the sudden, unexpected onset of complete AV block with delayed ventricular escape — therefore resulting in a potentially prolonged period without any QRS on ECG. Prior to the prolonged pause — the patient manifests 1:1 AV conduction without other evidence of AV block (which is why onset of PAVB is typically so unsuspected! ).
  • Because of its totally unexpected onset and propensity to result in sudden death — PAVB is difficult to document and significantly underdiagnosed.
  • Three mechanisms for producing PAVB have been described: i) Vagally mediated (ie, Vagotonic Block — as described in the January 31, 2019 post, — and in more detail HERE — with the references listed at the end this Blog post citing instances of transient asystole from excessive vagal tone!)ii) Intrinsic (Phase 4 = pause- or bradycardic-dependent) PAVB; — andiii) Idiopathic.

i) Vagotonic AV Block:
This form of PAVB is potentially benign when it results from a transient profound surge of parasympathetic tone in an otherwise healthy individual (as might occur with an episode of severe vomiting; a fit of severe coughing; vasovagal reaction from a blood draw).
  • The problem with vagotonic PAVB is localized to within the AV Node.
  • There will often be a "prodome" of diaphoresis, nausea, dizziness — with the patient aware of imminent fainting.
  • Characteristic ECG findings of vagotonic PAVB include progressive sinus rate slowing — often associated with an increasing PR interval and a narrow-QRS escape focus — followed by recovery with progressive return to a normal sinus rate and normal PR interval.

ii) Intrinsic PAVB:
Several names have been attached to this mechanism of PAVB — including most commonly "Phase 4 AV block" and/or PD-PAVB (Pause-Dependent PAVB).
  • PD-PAVB appears to be the primary mechanism for the cardiac rhythm in today's case (albeit potential for some vagal contribution given variability in the atrial rate in Figure-1). As per Dr. Frick — the underlying pathology of PD-PAVB is severe His-Purkinje System disease (supported by the finding of QRS widening with conducted beats in today's rhythm strip). This form of PD-PAVB is likely to be fatal unless the patient receives a permanent pacemaker.
  • As is superbly shown by Dr. Frick's case — the interesting pathophysiology of PD-PAVB results from chance occurrence of an "appropriately-timed" PAC or PVC that partially depolarizes the diseased HPS (His-Purkinje System) at a specific point in the cycle that renders the poorly-functioning HPS unable to complete depolarization. The resultant prolonged pause in ventricular depolarization may only resolve if another "appropriately-timed" PAC or PVC occurs at the precise point needed to "reset" the HPS depolarization cycle (which presumably explains why the patient in today's case spontaneously recovered).
  • Of note — although QRS widening and 1st-degree AV block is seen for conducted beats in today's case — up to 1/3 of patients with PD-PAVB do not show evidence of conduction defects on ECG. This complicates documentation and explains why it is so easy to miss the diagnosis.

iii) Idiopathic PAVB: 
This is the most recently described form of PAVB — in which findings are not fully consistent with either of the other 2 forms.
  • The baseline ECG before idiopathic PAVB tends to be normal.
  • No "trigger" for PAVB is evident (ie, no source of excessive vagal tone — and no precipitating PACs/PVCs are seen).

============================
BOTTOM Line: It's important to be aware of the various forms of PAVB — that up until recently were all-too-often undetected, especially in patients without evidence of conduction defect on their baseline ECG.
  • It is fortunate that this patient was monitored over an extended period of time ( = 4 weeks). It is humbling for me to see how easily the diagnosis could have been missed in today's patient.
 







  

Sunday, February 2, 2025

Sometimes a patient is fortunate to have a cardiac arrest

Written by Pendell Meyers 


A man in his 60s presented with acute chest pain.

Here is his triage ECG:

What do you think?





There is sinus rhythm with clear LVH. Leads V5-6 are suspicious for upright, enlarged T waves that are possibly inappropriate for the QRS complex, especially V6. But without a baseline for comparison, it would be difficult for me to say that it is specific and diagnostic for OMI. The Queen of Hearts agrees, calling the ECG not specific for OMI.

Smith comment: V6 is very atypical for LVH and very suspicious for OMI.  There is a very high voltage R-wave without any S-wave (terminal QRS distortion) and with a concordant ST segment and T-wave, with convex ST segment.  It is essential to compare with old ECGs.  In the absence of old ECGs, one must record serial ECGs every 15 minutes.

He had several older ECGs on file, here are two examples:

6 days prior:


2 months prior:


In the context of ACS symptoms, and when able to compare the new vs. old ECG, the top ECG is DIAGNOSTIC of OMI until proven otherwise. 

Unfortunately, the ECG was interpreted as no significant change from prior, "no STEMI"!!

He was sent back to the waiting room, where he suffered a VF arrest. Defibrillation was performed, and ROSC was achieved. 

Approximately 5 minutes after ROSC, this ECG was obtained (about 45 minutes after arrival):

Obvious anterolateral OMI, and STEMI criteria positive for those who care or need it.

Smith comment: The patient was lucky to have a cardiac arrest.  Had he not had one, he would have sat in the waiting room until his entire myocardium at risk infarcted.  By undergoing an arrest, providers became aware of his OMI which had not been noticed on his diagnostic ECG, and he thus has a chance at some myocardial salvage.

Also: notice how the LAD Occlusion results in DECREASED S-wave amplitude, compared to the previous ECGs, in V2 and V3.  I have noticed that this nearly always happens, and is the reason that you rarely find an ECG that shows BOTH LVH with high right precordial amplitudes AND acute STEMI/OMI.


Total proximal LAD occlusion was found and stented at angiography soon after the ECG above. Here are some images:







Next morning ECG:
Reperfusion findings are clear..
There is some R-wave preservation, a good sign that some myocardium remains viable




Echocardiogram:
EF 15%
Severe global hypokinesis
Akinesis of basal-mid inferior and inferoseptal myocardium
Severe hypokinesis to akinesis of apical anteroseptal, anterior, and inferoseptal myocardium

An echo from 3 months ago showed an EF of 40% with global mild hypokinesis, without focal wall motion abnormalities.

Smith comment: the initial echo was so bad because even myocardium that was salvaged was "stunned" and it takes time to recover function.  Weeks later, the EF improved from 15% to 40%.  If this patient had not had ventricular fibrillation and thus not had a reasonably short door to balloon time, all of that stunned myocardium would instead be permanently infarcted, with permanent 15% EF.

Troponin I quickly exceeded the laboratory limit of reporting at 25,000 ng/L.


4 days later:

Continued reperfusion.


He was discharged home, but quickly bounced back 4 times within the next few months for worsening heart failure. Long term outcome is not available.





===================================
MY Comment, by KEN GRAUER, MD (2/2/2025):
===================================
We need to learn from cases like today's. Today's initial ECG is not an easy tracing to interpret. This is because (as per Dr. Meyers) — there is obvious LVH that complicates assessment for potential acute ST-T wave abnormalities.

  • To Emphasize: Once again — the history is KEY. This patient is a man in his 60s who presented to the ED with new CP. As a result — without yet looking at the initial ECG, our "mindset" has-to-be awareness that this history alone places this patient in a higher risk category for having an acute cardiac event. 
  • As a result — Our "mindset" has-to-be that we need to rule out an acute event, rather than the other way around. This means that if there is any uncertainty about the diagnosis (or about the initial ECG) — that we need to "dig further" until we arrive at more certainty in our diagnosis. Unfortunately, this was not done in today's case. I say this — because compared to an ECG done just 6 days earlier — there clearly has been significant ST-T wave change, that in this patient who presents to the ED with new CP — has-to-be recogized as an acute OMI until proven otherwise (See Figure-1 below — in which I place these first 2 tracings in today's case together).

What Are the Oversights?
In my experience — many (if not most) clinicians do not compare serial ECGs by placing both ECGs that they are looking at side-by-side.
  • I fully acknowledge that I miss important findings when I do not do this. I know this was not done in today's case — because if side-by-side comparison had been done — then the difference in ST-T wave appearance between leads V4,V5,V6 in ECG #1 and ECG #2 would not have gone unnoticed. 
  • We have often remarked on the challenge that LVH may pose for recognizing acute ischemic changes. This is because LV "strain" often manifests straightened and elevated ST segments in anterior leads with deep S waves from marked LVH. For example, as an isolated finding — I would not necessarily interpret the ST segment straightening and elevation that we see in leads V2,V3 of ECG #1 (outlined in RED and light BLUEas abnormal in a patient with marked LVH.
  • The other challenge posed by the ECG of a patient with marked LVH with "strain" — is distinguishing between the ST-T wave inversion in one or more lateral leads due solely to LVH — vs that due to acute ischemia or infarction. This distinction is further complicated because marked LVH may at times mask the ST-T wave changes of acute ischemia. That said — the asymmetric ST-T wave depression in lead V6 of ECG #2 is classic for the ECG appearance of LV "stain". But 6 days later (ie, when ECG #1 was recorded) — there is not even a hint of ST flattening or depression in leads V4,V5,V6. This means that the ST-T wave appearance in ECG #1 clearly represents an acute change (compared to ECG #2) that would not be missed if there had been lead-to-lead comparison between these 2 tracings.

Figure-1: Comparison between today's initial ECG — with a prior ECG done just 6 days earlier.


How to Remember ECG Findings of LVH and LV "Strain"?

There are over 50 criteria in the literature for the ECG diagnosis of LVH. And — the ST-T wave appearance of LV "Strain" and "Strain Equivalents" is subjective, and can be confusing.

  • To facilitate recall of these concepts — We've conveniently added a link in the menu at the top of every page in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog that takes you to My Comment in the June 20, 2020 post, in which I review a user-friendly approach to ECG recognition of LVH and "Strain" (See Figure-2).


Figure-2: Handy link to LVH Criteria (conveniently placed in the menu at the top of every page in Dr. Smith's ECG Blog).


WHY then is Today's Initial ECG So Difficult to Interpret?

The above said — I still found today's ECG incredibly difficult to interpret for the simple reason that there is marked overlap of QRS complexes in virtually all of the chest leads.

  • Confession: I spent over half an hour staring at the QRS complexes in each of the chest leads, trying to distinguish between the limit of R waves from overlapping S waves. I am still not certain that my color-coding in Figure-1 is completely correct.
  • KEY Point: Whereas the ST segment straightening and elevation that we see in leads V2 and V3 of ECG #1 does not necessarily look abnormal (because as noted earlier — LV "strain" from marked LVH may show this ST-T wave appearance in anterior leads) — the same is not true for leads V4,V5,V6.
  • Lead V4 in ECG #1 (outlined in dark BLUE) — manifests an S wave that is only 13 mm deep. Doesn't the coved and elevated ST segment in this lead look disproportionate and abnormal?
  • As noted earlier — LV "Strain" manifests as ST-T wave depression in lateral leads (or at least as ST-T wave flattening). LV "strain" does not manifest as ST segment coving and elevation, as we see in lead V5 and especially in lead V6 of ECG #1.


What Could Have Been Done to Facilitate Interpretation? 

  • Rather than normal standardization — I would have immediately repeated today's initial ECG at half-standard voltage. Doing so would have minimized overlap — and facilitated appreciation of disproportionality by clarifying relative size of QRS complexes and ST-T waves.