A 61 year-old with chest pain arrived to the ED by ambulance with resolving chest pain. Here is his ED ECG:
|The computer interpretation was "normal"|
What do you think?
This ECG is NOT normal. The T-waves in V2-V4 are very large in proportion to the QRS. They are suspicious for hyperacute T-waves. There is low QRS amplitude.
Can you trust a computer interpretation of "normal?"
---Most of the time, but obviously not all the time.
This recent study, discussed on Salim Rezaie's fine site REBEL EM, implies you can trust the computer interpretation of "normal." (http://rebelem.com/triage-ecgs-reducing-interruptions-busy-ed/)
What to do?
Recording serial ECGs would be useful. The chest pain is resolving, so if these are resolving hyperacute T-waves, then followup ECGs should show their size diminishing.
However, when I saw this patient, I knew that he had come by ambulance, so I knew there must be a prehospital ECG recorded somewhere and went to look for it.
I found it.
Here it is:
|Need I say more?|
Yes, I'll say more: see the computer interpretation:
"Normal variant ST elevation, consider early (repolarization)"
Why the medics did not see it, I'm not sure.
The cath lab was activated, as it should be with transient STEMI.
See this case of transient STEMI:
Angiogram: There was 80% obstruction of the LAD with a large thrombus and TIMI-2 flow; the thrombus was suctioned out.
All serial troponins were undetectable!
Had we not seen those subtle hyperacute T-waves, and then sought out the prehospital ECG, the patient would have ruled out, with one of three outcomes:
1. Subsequent thrombus propagation with re-occlusion, recurrent chest pain and diagnosis made (although perhaps late and perhaps only after an adverse outcome)
2. Undergone stress test with uncertain results.
3. Been discharged to home with potential disastrous outcome.
1. Computer algorithms that make the diagnosis of "normal" are usually correct, but is usually good enough?
2. Computer algorithms are completely unreliable at diagnosing STEMI, with both poor sensitivity and poor specificity. Here are two recent articles confirming this:
a. The Comparison of Physician to Computer Interpreted Electrocardiograms on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Door-to-balloon Times.
b. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: An evaluation of three automated interpretation algorithms
3. Always look for the prehospital ECG
4. Hyperacute T-waves occur not only shortly after onset of chest pain (as the ST segment is about to rise, or "on the way up"), but also shortly after reperfusion (as the ST segment is resolving after reperfusion or "on the way down").
5. With very brief occlusions, troponins may all be negative. What would high sensitivity troponins have shown? We don't know.